The Center for Teaching and Learning works with Baruch faculty across departments to prepare materials for hybrid course sections. It engages with public scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) on hybrid course design and pedagogies related to educational technologies, accessibility, and universal design of instruction (UDI); anti-racist teaching and learning; and active and experiential learning. The CTL additionally maintains and workshops Blogs@Baruch, which operates on a WordPress platform.
To date, hundreds of Baruch faculty, both part and full-time, have participated in professional development and longer-format seminars on hybrid course development. You can find a list of participants and their associated courses below.
Are you part of a teaching and learning center and/or looking to run your own faculty development?
Download our professional development toolkit.
The CTL’s Hybrid Teaching Seminar
Since 2014, Baruch’s Center for Teaching and Learning has offered its CTL Faculty Fellows Hybrid Seminar to assist interdisciplinary cohorts of faculty in shifting a course to the hybrid format. Seminar participants are encouraged to think creatively about how teaching in this format can open up new pedagogical opportunities within and across disciplines. The seminar is run as a model of the hybrid course structure itself, and its theoretical underpinnings are based in an active, critical, social constructivist view of learning. You can learn more about social constructivism here.
With the guidance of the CTL staff and feedback from other faculty fellows, participating faculty will develop syllabi, assignments, assessments, online learning resources, and digital spaces for their course. Faculty Fellows will be matched with a CTL Hybridization Fellow, whose role is to support and collaborate with the Faculty Fellow throughout the semester. The seminar is offered during the fall or spring semester. If you are interested in participating, please email ctl@baruch.cuny.edu.
In the Hybrid Seminar, we ask participants to ….
Hybrid ≠ less work. Participants are expected to complete assignments, interact with others on-line, and come to each face-to-face session fully prepared. We introduce a number of new technologies in the seminar and provide tutorials to guide participants through figuring out issues on their own. If participants get frustrated with the tech at times, that’s normal; it’s part of the learning experience.
We design activities to facilitate extensive participant interaction, reflection, and collaboration. We ask participants to join in on discussions, do reflective writing and thinking, annotate texts and videos digitally, and other active learning activities that rely on them having done their homework. A key success factor is everyone’s engagement. Therefore, we expect participants to attend each session in its entirety and participate as fully as able. That said, what we mean by “participation” is not always the same thing as “talking a lot.” We discuss and build group agreements for participation together in the first session. We offer one-on-one consultations as a chance for participants to focus on topics specific to their needs and/or discipline. At times, we also connect participants with previous seminar alumni or various offices on campus to answer questions that we can’t answer.
The seminar is designed to bring together instructors from a variety of disciplines, so participants can learn about approaches to teaching and learning that may be unfamiliar to them from peers outside of their own discipline.
We ask participants to articulate—and sometimes to challenge—their values and assumptions as a teacher. We sometimes ask participants to read challenging or controversial material that takes a critical view of educational technology, universities, and society. Our hope is that participants can take this as an opportunity to reflect on why they do what they do (a process that we also undergo very frequently as facilitators!)
Participants are introduced to a lot of new technologies throughout the seminar. We don’t expect them to use all of new tech in their class, and in fact, an effective hybrid course can be a course that uses very little technology. We just want participants to know their options. We ask participants to keep an open mind and to sit with the ideas in the readings, the activities, and the other seminar content, even if they don’t agree or if these things don’t feel immediately relevant to their context.
We set up the format for the Hybrid Seminar as a way to model what we ask participants to do in their own classrooms. We ask them to take and build on anything they like about the seminar and use it in their own classes (this includes session activities, instructions or documentation that we use, readings we assign, or any resources that we provide during the course of the seminar). We also encourage them to improve the things they don’t like about the seminar. And tell us how it goes. We’re always trying to improve what we do. Lastly we note that if we ever use participants’ work, we will ask for their permission first. We are teachers, too, and we feel strongly about asking (and compensating) faculty for their labor.
