Disclaimer: I might be missing the point here.
Unlike many others at the time of Kobe Bryant’s death, Amira Rose Davis writes off the darker side of his legacy: his rape allegation and how it was swept under the rug. Of which, I think Davis makes a great point by doing so. In her piece, she writes, “Winning seems to absolve many things. So does money.” And as someone who has never been a big basketball fan, the extent of my knowledge only tells me that Kobe was a basketball player. Unsurprisingly, his rape allegation and charges were left unknown to me. For people with a public image and brand, any accusations would appear as a PR nightmare. They want to settle it as quickly and quietly as possible while appeasing their fans. Well, as it turns out, that’s pretty much what happened. The charges were dropped, and Kobe went back to his day. For most, this bump in the superstars journey was already part of the past and to be forgotten. However to others, this wasn’t the case. When an artist painted a mural in honor of Bryant, someone overnight added the words “rapist” next to it. As quickly as the words were added, they were painted over. To this, Davis makes the point that the faults in our idols are often smooth over and buried. They are memorialized in a way that almost gives them an untouchable status even after death.
But while I agree and understand Davis’s argument here, I can also see why the opposite would think otherwise. It’s never easy to think of your hero as someone you thought them not to be. It was no different for his mourning family, friends and fans. If someone were to tell me that my dad was an alcoholic that once beaten a woman in drunken stupor, I would be shocked and in disbelief. If my dad were to pass away the next day, do I exactly want to tell everyone of my dad’s dastardly deed? It’s not to say that the truth shouldn’t be allowed to exist, but there’s more at hand here than just this. To me, my dad was a person who I could rely on. Someone I can trust and someone who loved me. When I would write his eulogy, I think it would do him injustice to write of his faults. Because I remembered my dad as a good person, and that I know he is a good person. I don’t think it’s fair to sum up his life’s achievement as an assaulter. So in Kobe’s case, I think it’s premature to write him off as wicked without truly knowing him. His victim’s grievances may never be fully addressed in the lieu of his death, but it will forever remain as a dark mark on his legacy for sure. Because to the greater and unattached population, it’s easier to remember his good and bad.