Revise

“It is far easier for most beginning writers to understand the need for rereading and rewriting than it is to understand how to go about it” (Page 194).

Revision is one of the most crucial elements in any writing process because it is only when one takes the time to go over a literary work that they can create something that will be worth the time and effort of the intended readers. In the article “The Maker’s Eye: Revising Your Manuscripts,” Donald Murray notes that it “It is far easier for most beginning writers to understand the need for rereading and rewriting than it is to understand how to go about it” (Page 194). This statement implies that most people in the early stages of writing might be aware that it is necessary to revise their manuscripts but many might not know how they should conduct the process of rewriting. An analysis of Murray’s quote reveals that the verb understand, which has been used twice, is intended to describe the state of being cognizant of the importance of both rereading and rewriting. In turn, the words rereading and rewriting point to the idea that revision is a significant aspect of writing. Thus, one could deduce that it is only when a piece of writing has been checked through severally and the necessary corrections made that it can be deemed ready for consumption by the target audience.

A different approach that can be undertaken in an attempt to uncover the importance of revision would be to consider the differences between revision and writing. As stated earlier, new writers are often aware that they need to rewrite and reread what they have written but most may not know how to go about the two processes. Revision thus comes in handy because it provides an opportunity for both upcoming and seasoned writers to go over their manuscripts and to make the necessary adjustments as they seek to create compelling literary works. Alternatively stated, revision comes after the writing process but it is just as important because it enables the writer to invest their time and effort into critiquing their work so that they can create a perfect or near-perfect final draft. Therefore, it would be better for one to not write at all if they do not intend to revise their work and make it error-free.

Murray reinforces the importance of revision by noting that a writer must be his or her own worst enemy. According to the author, a writer must “detach themselves from their own page so they can apply both their caring and their craft to their own work” (Page 196). He further notes that detaching oneself is not always easy but that it’s an effective way of revising because it allows writers to accept criticism and to respond by applying unbiased judgment. From this perspective, one can conclude that it is only when a writer is critical of their writing that they can produce pieces of writing that have higher chances of being regarded as masterpieces.

3 thoughts on “Revise

  1. I think it makes sense to think about the difference between writing and revising. You mention a lot of crucial terms here: rereading, rewriting, writing, revising, understanding. They all do seem important and you definitely leave the impression that they are! But, I wonder if you had enough space here to give enough attention to any one of them. You write revision is “to invest…time and effort into critiquing…work so that [the writer] can create a perfect or near-perfect final draft.” How do they do that and how is that different from the earlier phase of writing do you think? What is different and what does that look like to you? No need to respond here, just something to think about.

  2. I really think you did a good job unpacking Murrays words. One thing that stood out to me was you saying “it would be better for one to not write at all if they do not intend to revise their work and make it error-free”. If the rewriting rereading process is continuous and everyone has a different idea of an error, can any piece of writing truly be error free? At the end you mentioned writing being considered a masterpiece. Do you think fully critiqued work makes a masterpiece or are there other factors?

  3. I love the way you talked about knowing the difference between revision and writing but also made sure to include that both are equally important. In the end of the paragraph, you talked about revising to make one’s work “error-free”. This is a bit unrelated, but I’d love to know where you draw the line at revising a piece of writing being error-free. Is it possible one’s work could never be error-free?

Leave a Reply