The way any specific academic discipline analyzes something will look different (just as their methods might look different). But, depending on the macro-structure, there can be different kinds of ways of organizing how analysis is presented to readers.

So, how is analysis organized in each macro-structure? What do you see as far as how sections are constructed? How sentences are formed? The word choice? What is different and what is similar? Again, some of this might be discipline-specific, but some of it is related to values of making knowledge that is coordinated with the organizing principles of different macro-structures.

Skim the following and name the most notable similarities and differences of these articles that you notice in response to the above questions in about 150-200 words:

• Pages 9 to top of 18 (on the article in top right of page, NOT the PDF page number) of Thesis-Driven paper “Donald J. Trump and the rhetoric of ressentiment“ by Casey Ryan Kelly, published in Quarterly Journal of Speech (a journal in rhetoric).
• “Findings” section (i.e., Results) on bottom of page 600 to page 608 of IMRD paper “‘He said he’d deport me’: Factors influencing domestic violence help-seeking practices among Latina immigrants” by Angelica S. Reina, Brenda J. Lohman, Marta María Maldonado, published in Journal of Interpersonal Violence (cited in the Qasim article; a journal in social science studies of trauma and violence).
• Bottom of page 2 to page 6 (look at PDF page number) of Problem-solution paper “Immigration White Paper” published by the Christian Community Development Association (a group that seeks to connect Christians and help under-served communities).

After commenting below, click on the button below to continue.