Something I heavily resonated in this piece of writing were some aspects on the theme of acts of revision. Often times, I feel editors are a little bit too general in marking their comments and might simply write a one word comment, such as “Awk”, referring to an awkward phrase or something in that context. I think if an editor is so general in that sense and is there to help a writer work on corrections, they need to be more specific in their explanation. Marking a paragraph, or even a simple sentence as “Awk” does not allow me as a writer to make those corrections because I do not know how. What about my sentence do you not understand? Is it the wording or the overall message or content? I think an editor needs to be more clear and us as writers need to “ask the responder for further explanation” as the article briefly puts it. When the people in my writer’s group respond to my paper and have suggestions for me on what to edit, I intend to question them on exactly what they mean in terms of any correction they would like me to make that I am unclear of, otherwise there would be no point of making those suggestions in the first place.