http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/20/questions-for-free-market-moralists/?hp
Is the free-market system of economy, in which you justly deserve everything you earn, really the most humane system for us? The Nozickian thinking which has increased significantly among Western governments within the last five decades is defined by the belief that everybody will be as wealthy as they deserve to be in proportion to their talents. The editor argues against this thinking by using principles of John Rawls to combat the morality of the Nozickian system. Through four questions author argues that people could be coerced into a deal without physical force, that not every free deal is morally right, that you don’t necessarily earn as much wealth as your talent would suggested bringing into an example individuals like Edgar Allan Poe, and finally that people should have common obligations that would benefit everybody. This article creates many thoughts on whether or not ethics should be looked at as an integral part of businesses, and economy.
