Style Review: Practice

Now that we got some style fresh on our mind, I want you to choose one paragraph that you have written in this class and revise it with at least two of the elements of style from the previous page in mind.

In a comment below, do the following:

  1. Paste the original paragraph
  2. Paste the revised paragraph with at least two of the elements of style from the previous page in mind incorporated into your revision
  3. Explain what you revised and why.

After commenting, click on the button below to continue.

Button that says click to continue

Style: Review

Throughout both Units 1 and 2, we have been working on style. We will continue doing some things with style throughout the term, but in the spirit of taking a break, I thought we would pause to do some review.

Please review these pages on style to refresh your memory:

  1. Style: Introduction
  2. Style and Translingualism
  3. Style: Words
  4. Style: Words and Register
  5. Style: Sentence Length
  6. Style: Sentence Type
  7. Style: Punctuation
  8. Style: Punctuation Practice
  9. Style: Coherence

Comment below, on one element of your style as a writer that you would like to keep working on this semester and why. Take about 100 words to explain.

After commenting, click on the button below to continue.

Button that says click to continue

Unit 2 Review

In Unit 1, we focused on rhetoric in terms of having terms to name aspects of what we do in our writing to help build awareness:

  1. Rhetoric and its associated terms: genre, audience, rhetorical situation, purpose
  2. Rhetorical analysis: analysis vs. summary, claims, evidence, linking claims to evidence, thesis, lenses

Below is from the syllabus:

Unit 2 – Rhetoric: Awareness and Writing
In this unit, we will explore rhetoric in greater detail. We will start with the importance of audience and the relationship between audiences and genre conventions (and the slipperiness of what we can ever actually fully know about either). We will then consider the full nature of the rhetorical situation (i.e., exigence, constraints, and audience), the impact of ideology on how everyone reads and writes, and consider the value of a rhetorical outlook on the world around us. To realize these ends, we will develop our abilities as rhetorical analysts. This unit will mostly address the third and fifth Learning Goals of the course (i.e., Read and analyze texts critically; Use conventions appropriate to audience, genre, and purpose). Some of the sub-goals for this unit include:

 

·      Learn the functions of rhetoric: make knowledge, coordinate human and nonhuman activity, and impact others.

·      Learn the differences between genres at the level of words, sentences, paragraphing, document design, mode, etc.

·      Change stylistic features of your writing to accommodate your audience

·      Recognize the full rhetorical situation to understand the context for writing

·      Consider the important material concerns for writing, to include different modes, circulation, and other infrastructural concerns for writing

·      Learn how to analyze vs. summarize

·      Find, evaluate, and synthesize evidence in texts we analyze

·      Establish links between claims and evidence

·      Apply theoretical lenses to what we analyze in ways that both expand and limit what we can know

·      Integrate textual analysis into a larger argument or narrative

 

Comment below to talk about which subgoal best represents the area of your writing you’d most like to work on and why. Take about 100 words to respond. We are still in the middle of this unit, so much of this is in-progress still.

After commenting, click on the button below to continue.

Button that says click to continue

Unit 1 Review

In Unit 1, we focused on writing in terms of emotion in two ways:

  1. our relationship to language and literacy, and
  2. setting good habits of writing practices and processes to help mitigate issues of anxiety around getting writing done.

Below is from the syllabus:

 

Unit 1 – Identity, Language, and Process: Emotion and Writing
The focus on this unit is primarily grounded in the first two Learning Goals of the course (i.e., Composing as a process; Compose with an awareness of how intersectional identity, social conventions, and rhetorical situations shape writing). We will explore together the emotional foundation of writing, language, and rhetoric—that our feeling is integral to how we know our worlds and communicate about them. Sometimes, for sure, the feelings associated with language can make writing difficult, even lonely. Thus, we will focus on thinking strategically about the entire process of writing. The sub-goals we explore will include:

 

·      Understand language as social and as part of who you are

·      Experiment with the rhetorical power of tapping into the full range of your rhetorical expertise (i.e., your rhetorical practices in all of the contexts in which you use rhetoric)

·      Understand the role of reading in writing (e.g., procedures of annotating, reading to revise)

·      Set goals and a process for checking in on your progress on an ongoing basis. Re-evaluate goals, periodically.

·      Develop a writing practice (e.g., creating the best environment for productive writing sessions as possible, managing distractions, time management)

·      Develop your writing process (e.g., planning, outlining, drafting, reflecting, revising, editing)

·      Receive feedback, apply it, and give constructive feedback (e.g., in peer response, workshopping writing, interpreting comments, integrating feedback in a global sense rather than only locally, managing the embodied nature of having an audience for your writing)

·      Using examples effectively in your writing to help illustrate things you are trying to explain or argue

You have tasks to complete for this page before moving on.

First, post to our Slack workspace to update us on how your writing process (i.e., the order in which you go from ideas to a finished piece of writing) and practice (i.e., the habits and environment you have set for getting writing done) have been going.

On our Slack channel for writing process and practice, give a brief update on what you have been doing that has been going well and what maybe has been a recent challenge in terms of your process and practice. Take about 100-200 words to do this. Feel free to post in response to others rather than have your own separate post if that can happen!

Second, comment below to talk about which subgoal best represents the area of your writing you’d most like to work on and why. Take about 100 words to respond.

After posting to our Slack workspace and commenting below, click on the button below to continue.

Button that says click to continue

Revisiting Course Goals

Here are the course goals. Take a moment to read them over.

Learning Goals (LGs)

 

  1. Compose as a process: Experience writing as a creative way of thinking and generating knowledge and as a process involving multiple drafts, review of your work by members of your discourse community (e.g., instructor and peers), revision and editing, reinforced by reflecting on your writing process in metacognitive ways.

 

  1. Compose with an awareness of how intersectional identity, social conventions, and rhetorical situations shape writing: Demonstrate in your writing an awareness of how personal experience, our discourse communities, social conventions, and rhetorical considerations of audience, purpose, genre, and medium shape how and what we write.

 

  1. Read and analyze texts critically: Analyze and interpret key ideas in various discursive genres (e.g., essays, news articles, speeches, documentaries, plays, poems, short stories), with careful attention to the role of rhetorical conventions such as style, tropes, genre, audience, and purpose.

 

  1. Identify and engage with credible sources and multiple perspectives in your writing: Identify sources of information and evidence credible to your audience; incorporate multiple perspectives in your writing by summarizing, interpreting, critiquing, and synthesizing arguments of others; and avoid plagiarism by ethically acknowledging the work of others when used in your own writing, using a citation style appropriate to your audience and purpose.

 

  1. Use conventions appropriate to audience, genre, and purpose: Adapt writing and composing conventions (including your style, content, organization, document design, word choice, syntax, citation style, sentence structure, and grammar) to your rhetorical context.

 

Comment below with which goal best represents the area of your writing you’d most like to work on and why. Take about 100 words to respond.

After commenting, click on the button below to continue.

Button that says click to continue

Learning Module 5 Recap and Next Time

This was a review and a time to reflect on where you are at! Hopefully you got some quality time to think about where you’ve been and where you are going across:

  • Unit 1: language, identity, writing process, writing practice
  • Unit 2: rhetoric and rhetorical analysis
  • Style: using words and sentences in ways to make texts readable, persuasive, and educational

We also talked a tiny bit about the logistics for our Midterm Learning Narrative and Midterm Meeting, as well as setting up Unit 3 on research along with QSR4.

Next Time

  • Finish up your Rhetorical Analysis draft due 11:59pm on Tuesday, October 13th.
  • Group Historians: let me know about the peer review process went this time around! Let me know by 11:59pm on Tuesday, October 13th.
  • QSR4 posted to the website by 3pm on Thursday, October 15.
  • Get to work on Midterm Learning Narrative due by 3pm on Tuesday, October 20.

Learning Module 4 Recap and Next Time

We focused on four things for this module:

  1. Reflecting on how your revision went for the Literacy Narrative.
  2. Starting to set up (if you haven’t started already!) the writing of your Rhetorical Analysis by focusing on finding your text and useful information about it, taking notes on your text, starting to formulate an argument, and making use of claims and evidence to perform an analysis.
  3. Some more focus on style, particularly the rhetorical affordances of punctuation and the readability of our writing through thinking about sentence coherence.
  4. Like punctuation, surveys help us pause and think. I wanted you to do some thinking on how the class has been going so we can adapt as needed (and also validate what is working well), so you completed a survey for me to help with that.

For 10/8, you will:

  • Read the Mermin chapter on writing about physics. (PDF on Blackboard>Course Documents>Readings)
  • Complete a Reading Annotation for Mermin with the old method that we have been doing all semester (we will adapt the Reading Annotation assignment once I have had a chance to look over surveys, which won’t be until Thursday, 10/8, at earliest)

Style: Coherence

Sentence coherence can best be thought of as ways in which you can position your sentences in ways where a reader can quickly understand why one sentence follows another. One of the best ways to think about coherence is the given/new principle in writing.

Generally speaking, the opening of a sentence (‘given’) contains information that the reader already knows and the ending of a sentence (‘new’) contains new information. The ‘given’ information is based on one of two sources:

  1. Something that was referred to in the previous sentence or earlier in the passage.
  2. Something that is common knowledge or transition words that signal reference (explicit or implicit—as in, inserting common knowledge at beginning that wasn’t mentioned yet, having a sentence of only new information because the new information implies the old/common knowledge, or a transition marker that refers back)

Here are some examples from chapter 4 of the professional writing textbook Business Writing is for Everyone:

It is easy to let your sentences become cluttered with words that do not add value to your message. Improve cluttered sentences [GIVEN] by eliminating repetitive ideas, removing repeated words, and editing to eliminate unnecessary words [NEW].

You should be especially careful when writing about groups of people in a way that might reinforce stereotypes. For example, [GIVEN; offers inference that example will illustrate point in last sentence] implied in his book Elements of Indigenous Style, Gregory Younging discusses how subtle bias can have a big impact when non-Indigenous people write about First Nations, Metis and Inuit people [NEW].

If you are a writer that frequently gets comments on papers that your writing is “clunky” or hard to follow, this can be one fairly easy method to improve the readability for your reading.

Comment below with the following:

  1. Paste two consecutive sentences from a previous piece of your writing that you feel is really cohesive. Insert “given” and “new” like I do above in the examples I provided.
  2. Explain what you think really helps with the cohesion and comment a little bit about whether it could be improved or if you have noticed general areas you want to work on at all in terms of readability in your writing.

After commenting, click the button below to continue.

Button that says click to continue

Style: Punctuation Practice

I want you to read a collection of sentences I gathered from a book called Brothers and Keepers by John Wideman. The book is a memoir about Wideman’s relationship to his brother. Wideman and his brother are both Black but lived very different lives, growing up in different places. Wideman spends the memoir talking with his brother, who is in prison, to get closer to him but it also is a way to think about his family history and larger societal issues of race and class in the U.S.

Wideman’s style uses a lot of different punctuation in interesting ways. So, I thought it might be good practice for you to read through some of his sentences and to think about which uses of punctuation stand out to you.

  1. The previous summer, 1980, a prisoner, Leon Patterson, had been asphyxiated in his cell.
  2. People in Homewood often ask: You said that to say what?
  3. Six years later my brother was in prison, and when he began the story of his troubles with Garth’s death, a circle completed itself; Robby was talking to me, but I was still on the outside, looking in.
  4. The hardest habit to break, since it was the habit of a lifetime, would be listening to myself listen to him. That habit would destroy any chance of seeing my brother on his terms; and seeing him in his terms, learning his terms, seemed the whole point of learning his story.
  5. Because Homewood was self-contained and possessed such a strong personality, because its people depended less on outsiders than they did on each other for so many of their most basic satisfactions, they didn’t notice the net settling over their community until it was already firmly in place. Even though the strands of the net–racial discrimination, economic exploitation, white hate and fear–had existed time out of mind, what people didn’t notice or chose not to notice was that the net was being drawn tighter, that ruthless people outside the community had the power to choke the life out of Homewood, and as soon as it served their interests would do just that.
  6. The borrowed pen and paper (I was not permitted into the lounge with my own) were necessary props. I couldn’t rely on memory to get my brother’s story down and the keepers had refused my request to use a tape recorder, so there I was.

After reading through these sentences above, comment below on 2 different uses of punctuation and how it had a rhetorical effect. Think to the last page where we talked about different punctuation is giving different lengths of time for pausing. Why would certain lengths and types of pauses have a rhetorical effect? Why use punctuation in the way it was used, why not just use a bunch of simple sentences that end in periods? Why not a comma rather than a colon? Etc. Try to think that through by throwing out some ideas as you read and react to the above sentences.

To comment, mention:

  • the sentence by its number in the list
  • the type of punctuation for both usages
  • what you thought was rhetorically significant about that use of punctuation for both usages

After commenting below, click on the button below to continue.

Button that says click to continue