Analogy
Writing, much like cooking, is a process of carefully selecting ingredients (structural components) and combining them with intention, allowing time and care to transform bare elements into something meaningful and satisfying. Particularly, the craft of argumentative writing can best be best compared to cooking seeing that it commonly follows a conventional format, though, configuration is not always desired with the two practices. Nonetheless, here is what I recognize as optimal argumentative writing structure.
Recipe for Argumentative Essay;
- A thesis statement (firm but flexible)
- 3-4 claims (ripe and robust)
- An abundance of evidence
- Compelling Transitions
- Conclusion
Among the other components listed in this recipe, the aspect of authenticity is the key ingredient that elevates the final product from merely competent to truly memorable. Authenticity infuses the work with a unique voice, a personal touch that resonates with readers or diners in a way that formulaic approaches cannot. It is the element that gives this writing in itself some sort of substance, open to be interpreted by the reader. This idea is in alignment with what À la Danny Licht presents within Cooking As Though You Might Cook Again, as he emphasizes the concept of non-conformed (true to self) cooking. With argumentative writing, I believe that authenticity brings a distinct benefit. In all of my experience as a writer, I’ve found that it is significantly easier to pre-emptively outline my work when I have a genuine interest for what I am writing about. The most blatant example I can picture is seen in the difference between writing a history research paper and writing about personal experiences. Inherently, I am drawn to self-reflection rather than regurgitating (what is presented as) objectively correct ideas and themes. By virtue of this idea, forcing yourself to write about something you are not passionate about will result in work that inaccurately displays your ability to convey an idea.
Instructions for Cooking (sort of)
Despite their being a given set of components, the order in which you put these pieces together can be completely arbitrary in my opinion. I find it easier for me to insert/extend whatever I have the most ideas about first in my writing. From there, I start to make sense of what I am trying to achieve as a whole, and the process starts to become figuratively similar to solving a puzzle. For instance, if I have yet to develop a thesis for my writing, it is likely that I will draw from the bulk of evidence and analysis that I may have in order to create an overarching contention.
Conclusion
Although it is subject to change, this format for writing is the result of constant, and ongoing, trial and error — not just my own, but that of countless writers, past and present, who have struggled to shape their thoughts into coherent, persuasive arguments. The societal significance of writing stands as universally obvious, seeing that the practice has innovated the way we think, communicate, and perceive.