- In Hengel’s approach, a claim or argument is developed by observing the text. This will help create a claim or argument, because then will have enough information to create an argument. In Hengel’s way, he first poses a problem about what he chooses to analyze, and then solves the big problem with smaller problems in different details. In the end there will be enough information about what he has chosen to analyze, which the exhaustive documentation. It’s going to make it harder when I’m not going to be able to ask a good macro question, so I’m not going to get a lot of other information.
- Adurraqib answered Hengel’s questions about his subjects, Carly Rae Joseph by arguing about the failure of making the song to the Billboard chart. Which also signifies that no listener was interested in this song. Hengel started by making a claim then backing himself to prove his statement. “EMOTION has been critically adored, despite disappointing sales total. None of the songs have lit the Billboard charts on fire” (25).
Abdurraqib sees the heartbreak.. Abdurraqib also used Hnegel’s strategies to make of it by getting a deeper meaning of one thing being analyzed. The writer of the book makes a statement about an extreme heartbreak using a question that goes in depth discussing the heartbreak. That’s how the writer and the audience can lead to deeper meaning, and detailed analysis. In the text, it states “real and deep heartbreak after a romantic relationship falls apart.” express an idea how heartbreak is in a really specific way and tells reader heartbreak means losing and missing is the norm.
One thought on “Nana’s Reading Response for 10/13”
Comments are closed.
Hi Nana, I wonder if Hengel’s method might be helpful as you write a conclusion for your essay. Do you think you could look back and find the macro-questions and micro-questions you explored in your own essay and summarize those as a way to end your work?