I like Ike

In his 1952 presidential campaign ad, Dwight D. Eisenhower attempts to convey to the public an image of himself as a nominee beloved by all who is being taken to the presidency by the adoring public. Using repeating animation cycles and catchy music, Eisenhower in this ad attempts to not only appeal to voters using this up beat happy image, but also places some of his political opponents in direct contrast to that happy beloved characterization of himself. The animated ad opens with the singers repeating the phrase “Ike for president”, as if to clearly state the purpose of this ad. Then the ad transitions into the happy catchy song set to images of crowds of people marching to the right of the screen. We see Uncle Sam, a traditional cartoon figure ordinarily used as a manifestation of American patriotic emotions, marching happily across the screen with an Ike pin on his lapel to show his support. We see an elephant draped with a banner on which is a cute caricature of the nominee, banging with his tail on a marching drum which drags behind him, invigorating and providing rhythm for the crowds of marching Ike supporters as the singers call for us to hang out the banners and beat the drums. Crowds which include cowboys, chefs, and railroad workers. This eclectic gathering of people meant to represent Americans from all walks of life uniting under the literal Ike banners that they carry.

This idea of universal support for Ike is further developed throughout the video. We see a presumed farmer driving a tractor with an Ike flag on the back. A married couple pushing a baby stroller, the baby inside of which is carrying an Ike balloon. Even the dog that trails behind them has an Ike flag attached to his tail. All while the music repeats the line “you like Ike, I like Ike, everybody likes Ike.” All while marching towards the right side of the screen, the side traditionally associated with the Republican Party and right wing politics. We are also briefly shown three donkeys, the donkey being the symbol of the Democratic Party, as the singers sing “We don’t want John or Dean or Harry.” This is clearly a reference to his political rivals at the time John Sparkman, Dean Acheson, and Harry Truman. As the crowds keep marching forward the background switches from a bright day landscape to a night time one, showing the crowds commitment to the case that would carry them forward day and night. As the night panel streams in we are also treated to the sight of a shadowy figure in the background once again riding a donkey going left in opposite direction to the crowd. While the singers make the message clear by singing “we’ve got to get where we are going, travel day and night for president. But Adlai goes the other way. We’ll all go with Ike.” The Adlai referenced in the lyrics, also most likely the person meant to be depicted by the background shadowy figure, is Adlai Stevenson, Eisenhower’s democratic opponent. And as the parade of citizens finally reaches their destination, Washington, a bright sun rises over the dome of the white house with the word Ike in the center of it, illuminating the land in bright sunshine.

Everything from the marching crowds, the Ike banners and flags all culminating in Ike himself, in the form of a shining sun, rising over the white house, down to the repeated lyric “I like Ike”, which would later become his campaign slogan, paints him as a candidate of the people. The song’s repeated use of “we” and “let’s” at no point focuses on the role that Ike has to play. Even when disparaging his political opponents, the lyrics are “Let’s do that big job right”, not he. There is a very clear lack of emphasis on himself. This is most likely related to the history behind his candidacy. In this video the idea conveyed to us is that the one most fit for the presidency is clearly the one most beloved and supported by the people.

 

I like Ike

Group C post

In his address at the prayer pilgrimage for freedom, Martin Luther King Jr. delivers a sermon-like critique of the obstructionist elements of government that he sees as being responsible for delaying any significant change for civil rights. He does so by addressing the reasons why despite the supreme court ruling in favor of integrated schools, it had still not become a reality. He specifically lays the responsibility on both the pro-segregationist presence in Washington as well as the lack of conviction on the part of the supporters of integration. Choosing to focus on the later, he calls out both democratic and republican supporters for over indulging the elements in their party that attempt to delay any real change from occurring. In order to achieve some measure of progress, Dr.King calls for putting an end to this wishy-washy attitude, calling for strong leadership on the part of all three branches of government. Leadership backed by conviction and ideology. But he also does not neglect the role that strong African American leadership must also play. Contending for calm, confident community leadership based in an unyielding christian tradition.

In his address, Dr.King uses language that strongly emphasis the role that conviction must play in political advocacy, attempting to show rather than just tell. His choice to repeat phrases in his speech that capture his main theme, gives his arguments the air of urgency and importance that he advocates for. He repeatedly uses the phrase “give us the ballot” in a way that aggressively stresses the difference that they would be able to make themselves if given the opportunity given their strong beliefs on the issues. As if to say gives us the responsibility and we will show you how it ought to be done. He repeats words like “strong leadership”, “courageous leadership” in order to accentuate the need for a commitment that extends beyond politics. His use of strong language to condemn the harmful elements of both parties is also notable. He uses clearly, and confidently disparaging language like “dixiecrats”. Pointing to the “hypocrisy of right wing, reactionary northerners” as betraying democracy and justice. Once again attempting to show what he preaches in delivering strongly worded, confident critiques. But what I found most notable in his speech was his criticism of the quasi-liberalism of white northern liberals. On that Dr.King writes “What we are witnessing today in so many northern communities is a sort of quasi-liberalism which is based on the principle of looking sympathetically at all sides. It is a liberalism so bent on seeing all sides, that it fails to become committed to either side.” (par.14) This criticism of a liberalism far more concerned with balance than it is conviction is one that we hear often in today’s political climate. Most notably as it relates to the positions of democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Looking specifically at Hillary Clinton’s remarks on reforming criminal justice delivered in Charlotte, NC we can see many of the reasons why. These remarks were delivered by Clinton at a church in Charlotte following the police shooting of Keith Scott in North Carolina. In her speech she attempts to console the family of Mr.Scott as well as the audience in attendance while also cementing her commitment to social justice and equality. But throughout the speech Clinton is very careful not to choose any one side. When she speaks of the shooting she makes a point of suggesting we withhold judgment until the full investigation is done. When she speaks of the fear felt by innocent members of the black community, she mentions both police violence as well as civilians with guns as being the causes. Also making sure throughout her speech to mention that police officers are also effected by violence and deserve our prayers. Her language throughout the speech appears to be deliberately bipartisan, attempting not to alienate any one side. In doing so however, she fails to articulate any commitment to any one side. In much the same way as the liberals criticized by Dr.King, in these remarks she appears far more concerned with advocating for both sides that she fails to stand up for either.

So what do you guys think: Do you believe that the remarks used by Hillary Clinton in this address fit the mold of the inefficiently centrist liberals of Dr.King’s time? And if so, what implications does the fact that she seems to exhibit many of the features decried by Dr.King as detrimental to the cause of civil rights have on her potential efficacy when it comes to advancing progressive ideals? Are their other moments in other speeches delivered by Hillary Clinton that exhibit these same sorts of positions?

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Bibliography:

King, Martin Luther Jr. Give Us The Ballot. King Encyclopedia, Stanford University, 1957, Washington DC http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_give_us_the_ballot_address_at_the_prayer_pilgrimage_for_freedom/index.html

Hillary Clinton. Remarks in Charlotte, North Carolina on Reforming Criminal Justice and Providing Equal Opportunity. Hillaryclinton.com, Hillaryclinton.com, 3 Oct. 2016, https://www.hillaryclinton.com/speeches/remarks-in-charlotte-north-carolina/