I like Ike

In his 1952 presidential campaign ad, Dwight D. Eisenhower attempts to convey to the public an image of himself as a nominee beloved by all who is being taken to the presidency by the adoring public. Using repeating animation cycles and catchy music, Eisenhower in this ad attempts to not only appeal to voters using this up beat happy image, but also places some of his political opponents in direct contrast to that happy beloved characterization of himself. The animated ad opens with the singers repeating the phrase “Ike for president”, as if to clearly state the purpose of this ad. Then the ad transitions into the happy catchy song set to images of crowds of people marching to the right of the screen. We see Uncle Sam, a traditional cartoon figure ordinarily used as a manifestation of American patriotic emotions, marching happily across the screen with an Ike pin on his lapel to show his support. We see an elephant draped with a banner on which is a cute caricature of the nominee, banging with his tail on a marching drum which drags behind him, invigorating and providing rhythm for the crowds of marching Ike supporters as the singers call for us to hang out the banners and beat the drums. Crowds which include cowboys, chefs, and railroad workers. This eclectic gathering of people meant to represent Americans from all walks of life uniting under the literal Ike banners that they carry.

This idea of universal support for Ike is further developed throughout the video. We see a presumed farmer driving a tractor with an Ike flag on the back. A married couple pushing a baby stroller, the baby inside of which is carrying an Ike balloon. Even the dog that trails behind them has an Ike flag attached to his tail. All while the music repeats the line “you like Ike, I like Ike, everybody likes Ike.” All while marching towards the right side of the screen, the side traditionally associated with the Republican Party and right wing politics. We are also briefly shown three donkeys, the donkey being the symbol of the Democratic Party, as the singers sing “We don’t want John or Dean or Harry.” This is clearly a reference to his political rivals at the time John Sparkman, Dean Acheson, and Harry Truman. As the crowds keep marching forward the background switches from a bright day landscape to a night time one, showing the crowds commitment to the case that would carry them forward day and night. As the night panel streams in we are also treated to the sight of a shadowy figure in the background once again riding a donkey going left in opposite direction to the crowd. While the singers make the message clear by singing “we’ve got to get where we are going, travel day and night for president. But Adlai goes the other way. We’ll all go with Ike.” The Adlai referenced in the lyrics, also most likely the person meant to be depicted by the background shadowy figure, is Adlai Stevenson, Eisenhower’s democratic opponent. And as the parade of citizens finally reaches their destination, Washington, a bright sun rises over the dome of the white house with the word Ike in the center of it, illuminating the land in bright sunshine.

Everything from the marching crowds, the Ike banners and flags all culminating in Ike himself, in the form of a shining sun, rising over the white house, down to the repeated lyric “I like Ike”, which would later become his campaign slogan, paints him as a candidate of the people. The song’s repeated use of “we” and “let’s” at no point focuses on the role that Ike has to play. Even when disparaging his political opponents, the lyrics are “Let’s do that big job right”, not he. There is a very clear lack of emphasis on himself. This is most likely related to the history behind his candidacy. In this video the idea conveyed to us is that the one most fit for the presidency is clearly the one most beloved and supported by the people.

 

I like Ike

Campaign Ad Analysis – Amson

amsons-analysis-post

Option #2:

After much thought, I decided to do my primary ad on “Hillary Clinton: Daisy” which revisits the original “Daisy” ad from the 1964 campaign.  In terms of context, there are many similarities in both ads, some of which are compelling and important to note such as the same implied message that disaster was imminent if we chose the “wrong” candidate and how both ads attempted to depict the other as dangerous and in a negative light.  Although the modern ad speaks to the original one by showing Trump as another “Goldwater”, it would be facile to ignore the key differences and elements that makes “Hillary Clinton: Daisy” unique.

I think in the contemporary ad, more rhetoric is used, much like the structure of a documentary, to describe the issues and stakes of voting for Trump while the historic one does it almost entirely through the imagery of the little girl counting down the daisy petals and in the later explosion scene if not for the short commentary towards the end.  More significantly, the differences in form highlight the variations in the tone by focusing on different aspects of the visual-audio effect towards the intended target audience, which demographically, is obviously different from that of 1964.

To articulate these elements more precisely, it is imperative to examine the ad by partitioning it into three equal segments of 10 seconds.  The first 10 seconds are grayscale, beginning with Hillary Clinton and the voice over from the original Daisy lady who is now probably in her 50s. This was perhaps trying to foreshadow a connection between the current election and that of 1964 and augment the stakes of this election by furthering the line of argument.  The next 10 seconds pan out from grayscale and directs viewers’ attention to the news correspondents statement “why can’t we use nuclear weapons” and the image of Trump talking before finishing the scene with Trump saying “bomb the sh*t out of them!”.  Therefore, I think it is important to think about the contrasts between these segments and analyze how the differences in form alters our perception of both ads, despite the similarities in their intended messages.

 

References:

Primary ad:

“Hillary Clinton: Daisy.” New Republic. Hillary for America, 31 Oct. 2016. Web. 31 Oct. 2016.

https://newrepublic.com/political-ad-database/hillary-clinton-daisy/MTAvMzEvMTY6RGFpc3k

 

Secondary ad:

“Peace Little Girl (Daisy),” Democratic National Committee, 1964 Maker: DDB: Aaron Erlich, Stan Lee, Sid Myers, and Tony Schwartz Original air date: 09/07/64 Video courtesy of the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library. From Museum of the Moving Image, The Living Room Candidate: Presidential Campaign Commercials 1952-2012. www.livingroomcandidate.org/commercials/1964/peace-little-girl-daisy  Accessed October 31, 2016.

Group C

Dr. Martin Luther King in his “Give Us The Ballot” speech on the steps of the lincoln memorial, urges the white aristocratic government which had so long oppressed the black population to rally behind his cause in granting the black population their civil rights and liberties. Which he continuously refers to in his speech as “Give Us the ballot”.

Dr. Martin Luther King expressed his dislike of the hypocrisy that was going on in the Legislature. The speech focused on the fact that the South in some way had colluded with the legislature to ensure that the black population could never attain their civil rights.

He uses language and tone that is meant to rebuke these corrupt acts. By referring to the Bible as a source or reference, he quotes verses that are meant to insinuate that the black population in a sense had done nothing wrong and that these very fundamental civil liberties that were being withheld from the black people were in a sense a sin against God.

Further down the speech, he makes reference to prior concerns that had previously been brought up by the black population. By citing these concerns in his speech, he essentially uses these concerns as a means of to bolster his arguments. In that, he threatens that if the civil rights cry was heard and addressed, he “might” be willing to give up all other secondary causes that he had initiated.This goes to show how important the civil rights act and the inclusion of black people in the democratic system meant to Dr. Martin Luther King. As much as he had wanted the passage of an anti-lynching law, he maintained that with the passing of the civil rights law, allowing Black people to vote would be the greatest triumph of the black community. He would be willing to forgo the other request that had already been presented to the government.

The right to vote in Dr. Martin Luther King’s perspective was sacred and thus the most important of all rights given to man by God.

Works Cited:

King, Martin Luther Jr. “ Give Us the Ballot” Washington Dc (1957) King Encyclopedia Stanford University.

Group C Post

On May 17th, 1957, Martin Luther King Jr. addressed the public in a speech, “Give us the ballot,” Address at the Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom. In his fight for civil rights, this was one important speech. He addressed the issue of voting rights for African Americans. His speech seemed like a sermon, especially when he attacked the strength of the leadership on the country at different levels. He talked about how their ways to prevent African Americans from participating in voting, was undemocratic and went against  what this country stood for. He tried to show that the inclusion of African Americans in the voting process would almost eliminate the need for campaigns about their basic rights, when he says “Give us the ballot, and we will no longer have to worry the federal government about our basic rights.”

Even though this was a speech given a long time ago, this issue still exists in another way. Even though, we all have voting rights nowadays, we still don’t know that our voices are being heard. There is no guarantee we have to know that our votes are being used just as they were cast. Even though they introduced glass ballot boxes to represent transparency, there’s no way to know that the votes were not rigged and results were not forged in any way.

So what do you guys think? Do you think that there are way other ways to hold the government accountable for completely transparent and non-forged elections?

Als, do you think that maybe this is the reason that a lot of the youth these days don’t really have the zeal to vote or get involved in picking a leader for our country?

 

Source:

L. King Jr., Martin. “17 May, 1957, “Give Us the Ballot,” Address at the Prayer Pilgrimage for the Freedom.” http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_give_us_the_ballot_address_at_the_prayer_pilgrimage_for_freedom/index.html

Group C post

In his address at the prayer pilgrimage for freedom, Martin Luther King Jr. delivers a sermon-like critique of the obstructionist elements of government that he sees as being responsible for delaying any significant change for civil rights. He does so by addressing the reasons why despite the supreme court ruling in favor of integrated schools, it had still not become a reality. He specifically lays the responsibility on both the pro-segregationist presence in Washington as well as the lack of conviction on the part of the supporters of integration. Choosing to focus on the later, he calls out both democratic and republican supporters for over indulging the elements in their party that attempt to delay any real change from occurring. In order to achieve some measure of progress, Dr.King calls for putting an end to this wishy-washy attitude, calling for strong leadership on the part of all three branches of government. Leadership backed by conviction and ideology. But he also does not neglect the role that strong African American leadership must also play. Contending for calm, confident community leadership based in an unyielding christian tradition.

In his address, Dr.King uses language that strongly emphasis the role that conviction must play in political advocacy, attempting to show rather than just tell. His choice to repeat phrases in his speech that capture his main theme, gives his arguments the air of urgency and importance that he advocates for. He repeatedly uses the phrase “give us the ballot” in a way that aggressively stresses the difference that they would be able to make themselves if given the opportunity given their strong beliefs on the issues. As if to say gives us the responsibility and we will show you how it ought to be done. He repeats words like “strong leadership”, “courageous leadership” in order to accentuate the need for a commitment that extends beyond politics. His use of strong language to condemn the harmful elements of both parties is also notable. He uses clearly, and confidently disparaging language like “dixiecrats”. Pointing to the “hypocrisy of right wing, reactionary northerners” as betraying democracy and justice. Once again attempting to show what he preaches in delivering strongly worded, confident critiques. But what I found most notable in his speech was his criticism of the quasi-liberalism of white northern liberals. On that Dr.King writes “What we are witnessing today in so many northern communities is a sort of quasi-liberalism which is based on the principle of looking sympathetically at all sides. It is a liberalism so bent on seeing all sides, that it fails to become committed to either side.” (par.14) This criticism of a liberalism far more concerned with balance than it is conviction is one that we hear often in today’s political climate. Most notably as it relates to the positions of democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Looking specifically at Hillary Clinton’s remarks on reforming criminal justice delivered in Charlotte, NC we can see many of the reasons why. These remarks were delivered by Clinton at a church in Charlotte following the police shooting of Keith Scott in North Carolina. In her speech she attempts to console the family of Mr.Scott as well as the audience in attendance while also cementing her commitment to social justice and equality. But throughout the speech Clinton is very careful not to choose any one side. When she speaks of the shooting she makes a point of suggesting we withhold judgment until the full investigation is done. When she speaks of the fear felt by innocent members of the black community, she mentions both police violence as well as civilians with guns as being the causes. Also making sure throughout her speech to mention that police officers are also effected by violence and deserve our prayers. Her language throughout the speech appears to be deliberately bipartisan, attempting not to alienate any one side. In doing so however, she fails to articulate any commitment to any one side. In much the same way as the liberals criticized by Dr.King, in these remarks she appears far more concerned with advocating for both sides that she fails to stand up for either.

So what do you guys think: Do you believe that the remarks used by Hillary Clinton in this address fit the mold of the inefficiently centrist liberals of Dr.King’s time? And if so, what implications does the fact that she seems to exhibit many of the features decried by Dr.King as detrimental to the cause of civil rights have on her potential efficacy when it comes to advancing progressive ideals? Are their other moments in other speeches delivered by Hillary Clinton that exhibit these same sorts of positions?

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Bibliography:

King, Martin Luther Jr. Give Us The Ballot. King Encyclopedia, Stanford University, 1957, Washington DC http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_give_us_the_ballot_address_at_the_prayer_pilgrimage_for_freedom/index.html

Hillary Clinton. Remarks in Charlotte, North Carolina on Reforming Criminal Justice and Providing Equal Opportunity. Hillaryclinton.com, Hillaryclinton.com, 3 Oct. 2016, https://www.hillaryclinton.com/speeches/remarks-in-charlotte-north-carolina/

Group C Post

Martin Luther King’s “Gives Us the Ballot” speech at the Prayer Pilgrimage of Freedom was an important address in 1957 and still is important today. The speech begins with the reference to the Supreme Court decision of Brown v. the Board of Ed. and how it was strongly opposed, especially by those in the South. King discusses two main issues that African Americans still need in order to thrive in the United States, voting and leadership. Martin Luther King lists what exactly is needed from leadership; leadership from the federal government, from all three branches, leadership from white Northern liberals, leadership from white Southern moderates and leadership from the Black community.

From leadership, King goes forth to discuss Christian morals and Biblical allusions and also how we, as a society, can grow from being oppressed and taken advantage of one another to being a brotherhood of humanity. One important issue that King discusses early on this speech is voting. King stated that “The denial of this sacred right is a tragic betrayal of the highest mandates of our democratic tradition. And so our most urgent request… is to give use the right to vote.” Voting is one of the most fundamental parts of the democratic process and King wants the federal government to grant that freedom to the African American community. King also repeats the phrase “Give us the ballot” six times, each time with a different declaration of fighting against the systematic racism and going towards equality and freedom.

A contemporary text to go with King’s need to fight for the ballot is a Washington Post Article, “Getting a photo ID so you can vote is easy. Unless you’re poor, black, Latino or elderly,” by Sari Horwitz. This article discusses how the adoption of voter ID laws have hindered the ability for citizens to vote, especially those of an ethnic minority, a low socioeconomic class and those who are elderly. Out of the states that took up this law, most of them are Southern states. These are the same states that fought against the Civil Rights Movement and the laws that accompanied it. These laws are basically the modern day polling tax and literacy tests that African Americans confronted after slavery until the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the article, it appears that the fight and plead started by King lives on to this day.

Questions

What can be done to open the ballot freely to all citizens?

Can we finally carry out MLK’s plan and use the ballot to end the problems of systematic racism?

Sources:

King, Martin Luther Jr.   “Give Us the Ballot.” Washington DC (1957) King Encyclopedia, Stanford University.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/getting-a-photo-id-so-you-can-vote-is-easy-unless-youre-poor-black-latino-or-elderly/2016/05/23/8d5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html

Group C Post – Amson

Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Give Us the Ballot” Address at the Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom in Washington, D.C (1957) was perhaps one of the most important speeches delivered in the Civil Rights Movement.  MLK begins with the Supreme Court decision three years ago and how it was met with fierce opposition by many states before highlighting the hypocrisy of the problem: “The denial of this sacred right is a tragic betrayal of the highest mandates of our democratic tradition”.  Not only does King establish moral inquiry of the problem but posits that they will ensure their basic rights if given the equal right to vote.  He does so precisely when he repeats rhetorically – “Give us the ballot” six consecutive times and each followed by a supporting claim such as alleviating racial hatred and establishing peace and justice after Brown v. Board of Ed.  Being one of the more famous quotes in his speech, as reflected by the title of this address, he articulates his argument superbly when he brings up the necessity for the “fourfold leadership” to “make racial justice a reality”, which he then describes in clarity.  Examining the text as a whole, it is clear how he alludes to Christian morals as the inspiration for the movement when he mentions the mutual “agape” and love of God that seeks not for Black Supremacy, but rather for racial equality and representation.  More importantly, however, I want to focus on the last paragraph because King makes an important prophecy of progression when he says “Keep moving amid every obstacle. Keep moving amid every mountain of opposition”. Although we are not quite there, we have made tremendous progress in racial equality and he can be proud knowing that the minority voice is now taken seriously in American politics.

Because of the nature of the text, it also makes sense to examine the quantitative report titled “An Intriguing Link Between Police Shootings and Black Voter Registration.” by Majumder, Maimuna.  Not only does it alludes to King’s “Give Us the Ballot” address by analyzing recent data on Black Voter Registration, it posits a statistically negative correlation with police shootings of blacks. This is really interesting because King was trying to fight the violence of oppression through the Civil Rights Movement by seeking the equal right to vote.  Astonishingly, the quantitative report supports King’s claim as the findings indeed suggest less police shootings in states where more blacks were registered to vote. However, it also raises a strong sociological question as to why this is the case?

Two questions I suggest to consider are 1) Judging from both texts, to what extent has racial justice become a reality yet due to MLK’s “Give Us the Ballot” address? and 2) If not, is the problem more because of our government or the law enforcement today?
______________________________________________________________________________

Reading: King, Martin Luther Jr.   “Give Us the Ballot.” Washington DC (1957) King Encyclopedia, Stanford University.

Relevant contemporary text:  Majumder, Maimuna. “An Intriguing Link Between Police Shootings and Black Voter Registration.” Wired.com. Conde Nast Digital, 29 Sept. 2016. Web. https://www.wired.com/2016/09/intriguing-link-police-shootings-black-voter-registration/ Accessed 27 Oct 2016.

Post Group Assignments

Post Groups [These are the groups for posting; these are NOT the same as your project groups.  You really have no particular collaborative interaction with the people in this group.  The designation is about when you should be posting on the syllabus.  Remember at least twice, you must make a comment to some one’s post one of the week’s you’re not posting.]

 

Group A

Akshay

Danay

Katrina

Kelsey

Samie

Kwame

Group B

Judith

CJ

Vanessa

Shin

Sherpa

Emir

Group C

Anthony

Aidan

Ilias

Jordan

Daisy

Amson

Group D

Abby

David

Taseer

Moctar

Kayla

Franklin