Campaign Ad Analysis Option 2

1. Hillary Clinton (2016): Daisy
2. Johnson (1964): Peace Little Girl (Daisy)

I have picked out two different ads that relate to each other but have been used at different times. My primary campaign ad is Hillary Clinton’s ad “Daisy” and the other one is “Peace Little Girl”, used by Lyndon Johnson in the year 1964.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign ad (Daisy) focuses on the comments made by Donald Trump for using Nuclear weapons. The ad begins with a girl in an open garden, standing next to a daisy plant and holding daisy’s in hand. The girl appears to be plucking the petals of the daisy flower, showing children’s playful and innocent nature. The particular scene in this video is featured in a black and white color, showing that the video is historical. We then hear the voice while the girl is plucking the petals of the daisy flower, “This is me in 1964”.The video than transitions from a historical video into the present day. A woman named ‘Monique Corzilius Luiz’ is sitting and facing the camera. She goes on say, “The fear of nuclear war that we had as children. I never thought our children would ever have to deal with that again, and to see that coming forward in this election is really scary”. As her statement ends, the videos keeps showing her worried face and then transitions to Joe Scarborough who says, “Trump asked three times, three times that why can’t we use Nuclear weapons”.  Then Donald Trump is shown saying, “I want to be unpredictable”. While the video continues to show Donald Trump speaking aggressively. Joe Scarborough asks, “What safeguards are there to stop any president, who may not be stable, from launching a nuclear attack. The video then shows, Michael Hayden (Former Head of CIA and NSA) saying, “The commander in chief is the commander in chief”, transitioning the video back to Donald Trump, who says “Bomb the sh*t out of them”.  The video is highlighting to us that Donald Trump can and might use nuclear weapons. Highlighting with Michael Hayden’s statement that commander in chief has the power to do so. While at the end, Donald Trump saying, “Bomb the sh*t out of them” shows that Donald Trump actually wants to use nuclear weapons.

The campaign ad used by Johnson in the year 1964 shows the same girl used by Hillary Clinton in her campaign ad. Actually, Hillary Clinton has taken a clip from Johnson’s video and she has used it in her own campaign ad. Most importantly, the woman that was speaking in Hillary Clinton’s video that she is really scared is actually that little girl who featured in the campaign ad of Johnson in the year 1964. In Johnson’s ad, while the girl is plucking petals of the flower, she is counting them insignificantly. Suddenly, she hears a voice of counting and the camera focuses on her eye and zooms in. There is an actual voice of count down and a nuclear bombs goes of showing us from far away. The video highlighting to us a girl’s innocence and then the impact of a nuclear bomb. Johnson then says, “These are the stakes. To make a world where all of God’s children can live. Or to go into the dark. We must love each other or we must die.” Later on the video says that the stakes are too high, vote for Johnson on November 3.

While looking at both the campaign ads we can see that Hillary Clinton in her campaign ad uses the similar tactics used by Johnson in the year 1964. Johnson highlighted the threat Children would have if he is not elected president, indirectly referring to rival candidate. The difference between them is that Johnson doesn’t target anyone, whereas Hillary Clinton in her ad highlights the threat of Donald Trump using the nuclear weapons. The idea that Hillary Clinton has portrayed in her campaign ad is a sequence to the 1964 campaign ad by Johnson. Another factor that contributes to what I am saying is the fact that Monique says that the fear we had as children is back again in this election.  Hillary Clinton actually wants to show that it is Donald Trump who will use that weapon again and kill innocent children such as “Peace Little Girl” in the video. She then provides evidence of Donald saying that he wants to use such weapons. Highlighting again the threat the world would have if Donald Trump becomes president.

Moctar Diarra

Link:http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/commercials/1972

Campaign Ad Analysis Post & Paper Overview

            The video I’ve chosen to analyze is the 1972 Nixon presidential campaign ad called McGovern’s Defense. This Nixon ad, based on the country’s defense was obviously made to discredit his democratic opponent, McGovern, in regard to his plans with the military, but what are the elements that make up this ad? Firstly, focusing on the visual, the 1^st Three fourths of the video are dedicated to images of a toy army. This toy army being zoomed into, becomes the central figure of every shot. And in this miniature army we have Green Toy Soldiers, Replica navy men, planes, boats and even floats. The green soldiers are the first to be shown, taking up the entire screen with a face close up, which may be detailing their importance. All these green soldiers have distinguishable faces, although they are very simplistic and share similarities. The different sections of the soldiers that are supposed to stand together, are here divided into sections that make it easy for some to be pushed aside. The pushing aside begins when a seemingly omnipotent hand shows up to swipe aside the army just as the narrator starts speaking about President Nixon’s opponent, showing a possible link between the 2. The hand is active for most of the video, and on cue. Every time cutting back is mentioned, these hands take away most of the army, section by section. Here, we don’t get close ups like we had had prior to the Hand showing up, now the miniature servicemen all resemble each other with their hidden faces heavily shaded. This could make them seem easily disposable. (The lack of compassion for army men is an aspect that is criticized.) All of the sudden, the parts of the army that were pushed aside are all seen in different piles, again, without any close ups. The audio starts being more noticeable here because, first, the narrator talks about American security and stops discussing McGovern altogether, and then the music changes. The background music goes from just simple drums in the first part, the type of drums played during wars in the past by drummer boys, to a brass riddled fanfare once President Nixon is brought up. This is when the second part of the video begins, whilst this part is shorter than the first one, it is much more lively, because first of all we have real people and a real environment. Here, we don’t only hear about the candidate and his plan but we see him in the midst of the action, speaking to, and guiding army men (seemingly, a General). The narrator’s choice of words changes here as well, as he went from using abrasive words and phrases such as cut or cutting into, with many numbers and technical terms in between to a wholly different word cloud. In the second part the words used are key words such as peace, negotiate, believe, strength and America, right before Nixon’s name is brought to the screen.

Word Document Version : ad-analysis

The Ballot or The Bullet speech by Malcolm X is considered to be one of the the most important of the 20th century, and even American History. This Speech given in 1964, an election year, is one where Malcolm X calls out and speaks on many issues regarding African Americans and America, like Self Defense, the Government,and Civil Rights. Overall, Malcolm X’s speech is very straightforward, and as you could tell by the title, The Ballot or The Bullet, he “tells it like it is” throughout. Although at first he tries to be somewhat warm and relatable, using the words we and us, his bluntness quickly takes over as he starts speaking about the condition of African Americans:

“It’s time for us to submerge our differences and realize that it is best for us to first see that we have the same problem, a common problem, we’re all in the same boat and we all are going to catch the same hell from the same man. He just happens to be a white man.”

The speech tackles the topic of the relationship between African Americans and the Government at that time,with Malcolm X stating that African Americans have done so much for so little in return, saying:

” Not only did we give of our free labor, we gave of our blood. Every time he had a call to arms, we were the first ones in uniform. We died on every battlefield the white man had. We have made a greater sacrifice than anybody who’s standing up in America today.”

He takes time to advise African Americans as well, making them aware of the importance of their vote. Malcolm X implies that they need to be more careful and more politically aware because, African Americans, by sticking together and being politically present, could possibly change the landscape of American politics. He criticizes Washington as well, saying that things aren’t as they appear,and that the government cannot be trusted. He adds that the Democrats, a party that African Americans religiously back , is duping them,with Northern Democrats and Southern Democrats (Dixiecrats, segregationists) working together. He repeats the words Democrats and Dixie around the same number of times here, maybe to insist on the fact that they are similar.

“That’s camouflage, that’s trickery, that’s treachery, window-dressing. I’m not trying to knock out the Democrats for the Republicans. We’ll get to them in a minute. But it is true; you put the Democrats first and the Democrats put you last.”

The Skepticism displayed towards the government in this speech is what leads Malcolm X to say the Ballot or the Bullet, stressing on the importance of African American Political awareness and their ability to rise up to gain their voice either violently or non violently. The skepticism displayed in the text can also be seen in the article from the New York Times titled “Young Blacks Voice Skepticism on Hillary Clinton, Worrying Democrats “, published in September 2016. In this Article the same concerns that were brought up by Malcolm X are brought up by the African American youth. With the youth asking questions like, Can we trust them? What have they done? and What will they do for our cause? It is said in the article:

“They are demanding more from politicians as part of a new confrontational wave of black activism that has arisen in response to police killings of unarmed African Americans.[…]because the conversation that younger black voters are having is no longer one about settling on a candidate who is better than the alternative.”

This quote from the Newspaper is a modern translation of Malcolm X’s which, again, emphasizes the importance of African American votes, and political awareness.

“A ballot is like a bullet. You don’t throw your ballots until you see a target, and if that target is not within your reach, keep your ballot in your pocket.”

This could lead to 2 questions. First, Has Malcolm X’s influence led the African American Community to be more Politically Aware now? And Does the government agenda that he mentioned in his text still exist nowadays?

Hi everyone,

We are Group 6 and our topic is the Police Force.

https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/policeforce6/

Amson, Kwame, Franklin

Hey everyone! The link to our website is posted below.

https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/bigbusinessinterests/

Samie, Emir, Kayla, Daisy

Hey, our group’s blog can be found here: https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/immigrationus/

Any feedback would always be welcome.

About

The B.E.A.T.

New American Noise. New Orleans. Bounce Music.

Director: Abteen Bagheri
Executive Producers: Tash Tan & Brooke DeVard Smith
Producer: Chris Black

By Peter Helman in Stereogum  (2/27/16).