-
Recent Posts
- The Man Behind The Music
- A Different Kind of Bar In Jackson Heights
- Live Music Theatre @ 92Y Tribeca
- What's Next for Dirty Mac?
- Realizing a Dream
- A Staten Island Band Strives to Make a Career out of Their Passion
- The Cyrus Movement Prepares for Musical Warfare
- Winston Ford's Information Highway
- Vespertina's Opera Songbird
-
Archives
-
Meta
Author Archives: Ellen
Posts: 14 (archived below)
Comments: 19
Wish 143 is an Absolute Gem
Director Ian Barnes brilliantly produced a heart-rending film that puts the mind and heart unease as the plot grew bigger from the size of a kiwi to a peach. Barnes isn’t James Cameron or Peter Jackson but his work, Wish 143, made it as one of the nominees for the 2011 Oscar in the short films category. With Tom Bidwell as the writer, the 24- minute film brought about many tears and laughter.
The story revolves around a 15 year old cancer patient who gets one wish from the Dreamscape Charity and in his presently ill moment, he pursued the desire to lose his virginity. Samuel Holland, who plays David, portrayed the character with sensitivity, sincerity, and full dedication to the role. He deserved applauses for creating a character that the audience can empathize with.
The film started out in a gray cloudy hue with David and the man from the Dreamscape Charity asking David to make a wish. Ideas like a trip to Disneyland, or meeting soccer player Gary Neville was suggested, however, like any teenager with raging hormones, David boldly said out loud he wants to have sex.
Scenes of comedy ensue as we are introduced to Father Carter, played by Jim Carter, who shows David a newspaper article regarding his wish to lose his virginity. A kind elderly woman responds to the newspaper article by telling David that she is willing to do the dirty deed of taking his virginity away, over at a bed and breakfast room she booked. David makes up a story that he already lost his virginity to get out of this one.
In a desperate attempt, David escapes the hospital to seek women off the street. After being rejected by a pimp daddy for being underage, it brought a tearful silence in the theatre, as David walked away in despair as it was obvious that his time was running out and feeling the self pity. Seconds later, the audience chuckled at the change of David’s facial reaction where he recklessly grabs a brick, turned around, and jump screen ahead, being bailed out of jail by Father Carter.
Similar to Cinderella’s fairy godmother, Father Carter, who was hesitant at first with helping David see his wish granted, eventually becomes understanding and helps David with his situation. Eventually, he becomes more than a priest to David, a mentor. “Sex is a sacred thing,” he tells David. Father Carter then sneaks David out of the hospital and takes him to a more respectable and professional call girl.
The events that happened and followed, although not entirely realistic, were very emotional and touching on screen. A film of schemes, mixed with comedy and sorrow of one’s unrealistic desire quickly became a self realization of the true meaning of love and happiness. David’s mission to seek out sexual pleasure from just any female partner failed but in returned his self journey helped him discover his desire was a cry out for love and company, and instead of finding it with what he thought would be, was found in his short-live friendship with the Father. It definitely left a mix of tragic and a sweet satisfaction to the end of the film.
Posted in Independent Film
1 Comment
Sweet Scoop Found in Long Island
Friday never felt so good: sunshine, warm weather, weekend’s coming, new episode of supernatural, and free gelato!
Recently, I brought a deal off a deal site called buywithme.com. For $5, you get $10 worth of Baci’s gelato and/or drinks. If you haven’t heard about buywithme, well here’s the deal. It offers daily deals to restaurants, spas and salons, gym, almost anything you can name. With deals that are usually more than half off the original price, what’s not to love?
The best part was, I didn’t get mine for $5, I got it for free! 2 weeks ago, Buywithme had a promotion where you sign up and receive a free $10 gift code. It’s gone now. The gelato coupon doesn’t expire until August 2011 but I’ve decided to use one of my 4 coupons now because I was craving sweets.
After an 11 minutes drive on to the Grand Central Parkway towards long island, I found myself inside Baci Gelato contemplating on what flavor to get. The display was kind of breathe taking, looked almost of a masterpiece. With a wide variety and free samples to try, I had to constantly keep myself from salivating. They have your original flavors vanilla, chocolate, to all sort of fruity and rich concoction; lemon, blueberry, coconut, passion fruit, hazel nut, tiramisu, black cherry chocolate, peanut butter chocolate, butterscotch, pistachio. Phew, that was just half of what they had.
The coupon called for 2 large cups. My friend, Chi, got the mint chocolate but I wanted to try something different. I only sampled 2 flavors, the tiramisu and pistachio because I didn’t want to be greedy. Guess what? It was AhhhhMAZING. So which did I go for? Drum rolls please——–Ferro Rocher. Although I came so close to ordering the pistachio, my eyes were fixated on the creamy chocolate hazel nut delightfulness.
It came with double scoops of the flavor, jammed packed on top of each other with a small wafer cone to top it off and embedded inside a cute daisy flower cup. MmmmMmm, it tasted exactly like the real thing. In almost every lick, you get a piece of hazelnut now and then and a rich fudge-like hazelnut chocolate swirl hidden under from all the thick chocolate madness. I wasn’t kidding when I said jammed packed double scoops; I gave up 1/3 of the way through and decided to take the rest home. This was enough to satisfy at least 3 people’s sweet tooth or one’s for a max of 2 days. Chi commented on how the gelato was “better than Beyers. Too bad it’s not sold in stores.”
Did I mention they have another location in the city at 47 W 20th Street? I’ll be seeing you soon—-very soon.
Highway Robbery at IFC but No Harm Done
I swore to myself I would never pay to see a movie since the price of a movie ticket shot up to $12.50 last year and now, for my trip to the Independent Film Center, $14. However, due to the Oscars coming up, my visit to see the Oscars Nominated Shorts 2011: Live Action was an exception.
Located on the lower west side, you’re more likely to spot me walking pass the rated R stores or dining in one of those nearby inexpensive hole-in-the-wall restaurants, but never at the IFC. Sure, I have walked by the Independent Film Center a couple of times but this was my first time actually going in.
Purchasing tickets was effortless; I ordered mine online for two. Upon arriving on a beautiful Thursday afternoon, I presented my credit card to the cashier, received my tickets, and walked in. The process took less than a minute: no line, no fuss, and none of the velvet red ropes that you have to snake around in to get to the counter.
I decided to get a medium popcorn since I did not eat breakfast, it read ‘organic popcorn.’ Organic popcorn? Two words I would have never expected to be put together. “Do you want butter with that?” One of the staff workers asked. “Yes, a lot please.”
With popcorn in hand and a seat close to the screen, I didn’t know what to expect nor did I had any expectation for it. The lights dimmed, and the previews started to project on the screen. After sitting through almost 2 hours viewing 5 short films and 2 previews, I walked out feeling satisfied that my $14 was well spent and the popcorn made the experience even more satisfying.
For a short-film virgin, I really enjoyed the experience, especially the deep meanings behind each of the films shown. I will definitely be willing to pay another $14 to see one of the previews shown, We Are What We Are.
Posted in Independent Film
2 Comments
Two thumbs down for Neighborhood #1
In response to a recent NYtimes blog by Mike Hale, he raised a question to his audience “Do you prefer the polish (relatively speaking) of works subsidized by sponsors or prominent Web-video sites? Or do you look for the rougher, let’s-put-on-a-show feeling of the D.I.Y. independents?”
Preferably, my vote goes to the sponsors’. After watching a short clip on the Indie’s Neighborhood #1 and a trade group’s Suite 7, it was no doubt that I had to watch the laugh-out-loud Suite 7 again.
Before I start babbling away with Suite 7, I do have to give credits to the producers, actors, and actresses of Neighborhood #1. Pamela Bell, who plays Mina was the star of show. With very little resources, the actress brought her best performances on set. One of the most entertaining parts happened when her 3 bearded pals from college left her in a jiffy when a hottie walked in, whom in turn, turned out to become more than beyond the grave. She created a believable situation that relates to the audience, or at least it does happen to most of us.
Now, Suite 7’s For Richer or Poorer, was hilarious and engaging. A short 6 minute clip sums up the plot of the film, 2 newlyweds finds out how little they actually know about each other on the night of their wedding. Tony Janning and Tara Perry, the couples fought about a stash of money found under their hotel bed. In every scene, the drama builds from verbal fighting over the uses of their newfound fortune whether it is a chicken slap to the face, caking a gal’s most memorable wedding dress, or sword fighting in ridiculous manners. It was just too sad that the fun had to end.
Viewer Robert commented on the ‘dull and obvious’ storyline and acting. He said, “The storyline and acting was cheesy and boring. I didn’t like any of it (films) at all. But perhaps it’s due to my generation liking.”
Posted in Independent Film
1 Comment