Sheri Fink does not reveal a biased story to her readers in “Deadly choice at Memorial”. Fink includes herself in the story based on how she obtained her interviewees but not on how she feels towards each of them. She allows the story to tell itself and for each person she interviews to tell their own story through her. She remains neutral throughout this piece to have a story based of facts which is more valid that a story based in someone’s opinion.
The role that ““The full details of what Pou did, and why, may never be known… arise again.” Is important because it leads way into what the story is about. Thus can be seen as a nut Graf. From this Fink, builds on Pou’s character as an individual being under pressure during an unfortunate disaster.
Fink organizes her story as a timeline narrative way. It’s readable and she focuses on Anna Pou, to be portrayed as a character in a novel. This helps to contribute to a much more interesting story. It is very detailed and helps give the reader a sense of what order the disaster occurred.
