-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Margarita Lappost on Heading Elsewhere for a Better School: Education in Washington Heights
- wdiaz on Less Art and More People: SoHo
- wdiaz on Searching for a Skateboard Haven in Hempstead
- wdiaz on Restaurant Row in Spanish Harlem
- Abel Ramirez on Heading Elsewhere for a Better School: Education in Washington Heights
Archives
Categories
- A.J. Liebling
- Amanda Burden
- Announcements
- Audio
- Backgrounder
- Commentary and Critiques
- Community Services
- Conflict Story
- Deadly Choices at Memorial (Fink)
- E.B. White
- Gish Jen
- Here Is New York
- Joseph Mitchell
- Multimedia
- Neighborhood News
- Neighborhoods
- Profiles
- ProfilesDRAFTS
- Reporting Notes
- Small Business
- Story Queries
- Uncategorized
Meta
Tag Archives: Joseph Mitchell
Protected: Joe Gould’s Secret
Posted in Joseph Mitchell
Tagged Jennifer Ross, joe gould, Joe Gould's Secret, Joseph Mitchell
Comments Off on Protected: Joe Gould’s Secret
Joe Gould’s Secret Response
Joseph Mitchell’s is very descriptive in his writing and paints a clear picture of Joe Gould. Mitchell’s first draft Professor Sea Gull is written as a feature story. The writing is descriptive, but the language in this piece is dated at times. “Once in a while he trudges up to Harlem and goes to one of the establishments known as “Extensions of Heavens” that are operated by followers of Father Divime, the Negro evangelist,” is an example of Mitchell’s use of dated language. His references to African Americans, prices of things and describing Gould as a Bohemian keep the writing trapped in a time period.
The language in Mitchell’s rewrite, Joe Gould’s Secret, is more lively and timeless. The overall flow of the rewrite is that of a novel and not a basic feature. The descriptions are more compelling and the piece is organized different from Professor Sea Gull. This allowed Mitchell to develop Gould in a chronological order with more detail about his background. The reorganization further allowed the reader to connect more with Gould’s character. As a result, Joe Gould’s Secret is longer than the original. In this case, longer is better because the writing is more contemporary and easier to read through. The downside is that the essence of the time period that is written becomes blurred, but the reader is reassured by the mention of dates and specific historical events.
Mitchell’s writing clearly matured in between the original and the rewrite. He seem to have learned more about Gould the second time around. Mitchell’s opinion is clear because both pieces seem to be written from his point of view. Joe Gould’s Secret contains more of his opinion than his original. Mitchell’s uses first person in the rewrite to personally describe Gould. In Professor Gould, he is more neutral describing the situation in third person, but not from specific personal opinion. This is what makes Joe Gould’s secret more of a novel or modern feature.
Posted in Joseph Mitchell
Tagged Earl Mays, Joseph Mitchell
Comments Off on Joe Gould’s Secret Response