Workshopping and reverse outlining helped tremendously, I was able to better analyze my own paper first and the later feedback helped even more
There were several strengths in my paper noted by me and my peer. First off, I had great ideas present. The themes I touched upon were interesting and gave a solid first start to my paper. I was also noted to having great grammar and punctuation for a first draft.
My weaknesses however were the main focus and what I looked for at most , my peer also helped out by pointing weaknesses that I didn’t see. First of all my draft was too short. I had ideas but i needed to expand them in order to improve my paper. Also, organization was lackluster, I jumped from one idea to another without connecting them. Finally, I didn’t analyze the language of the text, instead of using the language of the text and analyzing I was vaguely recounting the plot
My peer gave me a couple of ideas. She suggested that I expand the theme of Huck ‘s relationship with Tom, and make the paper more specific and concise. I will now write my paper with these corrections. I will split three large vague ideas into four more specific ones. I will also use and analyze the language of the text.
