Author Archives: Priyanka Dave

Summary of Activity on this Site


Number of Posts: 4
Number of Comments: 2

About Priyanka Dave

NO-CARD

Methodological Assumptions

Methodological assumptions consist of the assumptions made by the researcher regarding the methods used in the process of qualitative research (Creswell 2003). The procedures used by the researcher are inductive and are based on the researcher’s own experience in collecting and analyzing data. The research here is the product of the values of the researcher. Through an inductive approach, raw textual data is condensed into a brief, summary format. Clear links are established between research objectives and summary findings derived from raw data. A framework of the underlying structure of experiences or processes that are evident from the raw data is developed.

In adopting this approach the research questions might change in the middle of the study so that the research problem is better understood. Due to this, the strategy to collect data, which is usually developed before the study begins, has to be modifies to accommodate new questions. The researcher analyzes the data to develop an in-depth knowledge about the topic under consideration.

Application of Methodological Assumptions to Qualitative Research:

The main question addressed by these assumptions is: What is the process of research? Here the researcher uses an inductive logic, studies the topic within its context, and the employs the emerging framework/model. The researcher works with the details and specific information before generalizing. He then describes the context of the study in detail. Through the experiences that the researcher gains from the field, the research questions are continually revised (Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education (89-115)).

Thematic Analysis:Learning Through Patients’ Use of Obesity-Related Health Blogs

The research question that needs to be addressed through my mini study is : How do blogs about obesity influence 30-40 year old men’s choices between visiting a doctor and self-diagnosing from the blog?

I am conducting in-person, individual interviews with three men (of Indian origin, all working professionals here in the US). I have conducted two interviews so far and will be conducting the third today. The interview questions that I have designed will help me understand the rationale and motivation of these participants behind using blogs to address their concerns about obesity.

Following are the ten questions that I have planned for the individual interviews. Feel free to go through these. Are they sufficient? Is any question directing the participant toward a particular answer?:

  1. According to you what should be the functions of obesity- related health blogs?
  2. In the past 12 months, what activities did you do while visiting health blogs?
  3. What questions/concerns about obesity do you try to address through blogs?
  4. How frequently do you visit obesity-related health blogs?
  5. How did you become familiar with the concept of these blogs?
  6. Before being introduced to these blogs, what other resources did you refer to for getting answers to your questions?
  7. What do you think about the content that is out there on the blog?
  8. Do you feel the need to ask a doctor either before or after reading the blog?

–          If yes, why?

–          If no, why not?

9. How has referring the blogs impacted your relationship with your doctor?

10. What makes you revisit the blogs?

Any feedback / suggestion is welcome.

Me and My Research

I am a graduate student in the Corporate Communications program. My research interests lie in the area of the use of social media in healthcare. I want to learn about how various healthcare organizations use social media to interact with their communities and how patients use social media to address their health issues.

pharma-social-media

Chapter 7: Data Collection

In this chapter Creswell focuses on data collection and begins by describing the process of data collection as a “circle” of interrelated activities that include, but go beyond collecting data (depicted on pg. 146). He explains each of these activities, explores how they differ for each of the five approaches to inquiry, and on pages 148-149, provides a data collection table. The phases of the data collection process include locating site/individual, gaining access and making rapport, purposefully sampling, collecting data, recording info, resolving field issues, and storing data.

Individuals can be selected by chance, emerge from a wider study, or be volunteers. Creswell explains the individual selection process for five different approaches along with examples (Fig. 7.1 pg. 120; 2nd Edition). Researchers interested in studying their own organizations, places of work, or themselves, may pose issues concerning power and risk to the participants and the site. Accessing sites and individuals requires permission from the Institutional Review Board by submitting a proposal. The author provides a sample consent form in Fig. 7.2 (pg.152) and the procedures to follow for accessing sites and building rapport (pg.154).

Creswell describes purposeful sampling, one of the most common sampling strategies, as a technique for group participants according to pre-selected criteria relevant to a particular research question. Considerations include who/what should be sampled; what form the sampling will take; how many people/sites need to be sampled; is the sampling consistent with the information needed by one of the five approaches to inquiry. Several qualitative sampling strategies are listed in Table 7.2 (p.158). The most popular approach is maximum variation, which consists of determining in advance the criteria that differentiate sites/participants and then selecting sites/participants that are different on those criteria. The author’s recommendation on the sampling size is on pg. 157.

Observations, interviews, documents and using audiovisual materials are the popular data collection approaches and Fig. 7.3 (pg.160) lists these in detail. When conducting an interview, the author recommends identifying interviewees based one of the sampling procedures listed in Fig. 7.2 (pg. 158). Different types of interviews include telephone, focus group, and one-on-one. The elements of an interview are listed on pages 163-166 and a sample interview protocol is listed on Fig. 7.4 (pg. 165). Observation addresses issues such as the potential deception of people being interviewed, impression management, and the potential marginality of the researcher in a strange setting. Things to consider while observing are listed on pages 167-168. The author provides instructions for recording interviews on page 168 and example instructions for observing on Table 7.5 (pg. 169).  Observation can include a ‘descriptive section,’ which details the chronology of events that have occurred and a ‘reflective’ section for notes about the process. It is important to record the information by ‘logging’ or ‘jotting down’ the data.

Creswell discusses some of the field issues that researchers may encounter in the data collection process. The issues he mentions pertain to gaining access to the organization, observation, interviews, documents and audiovisual materials, and ethical issues. In order to gain access to an organization, the  author recommends that the site selected should be one in which the researcher does not have a vested interest (i.e. their own place of employment) since their closeness to the organization may affect their ability to code and clearly look at all aspects of the research experience. Issues that arise in observations and interviews can be related to the mechanics of conducting these activities. In terms of observation and interviewing, Cromwell recommends researchers take notes and record information accurately. Interviews can be taxing for new researchers and there should be collaboration in the way the interview is conducted so that both the interviewer and interviewee are sharing information equally. Documents and audiovisual materials (e.g. journals or video recordings) assigned to research subjects as part of the data collection process may result in the researcher having to decipher written materials that is difficult to read. Researchers are faced with ethical challenges in the data collection process (consent, coercion, confidentiality, deception, or the sharing of the researcher’s own personal experiences).

In terms of storing data, Creswell provides a listing on page 175 that details 5 important principles on how to store and handle a variety of data used in qualitative research projects.

The author concludes the chapter with a comparison of the five approaches (pg. 176) and how the approaches differ in their diversity depending upon what is being researched and the type of data that is being collected for the research project.



Comments:

"Good information explaining various approaches to qualitative research. Since I am studying about the interaction between patients and social media, I can now narrow down to selecting between the narrative approach and phenomenology. So, I am trying to analyze the effects of social media on: - patient’s trust -patient’s confidence -patient’s decision making capability - doctor-patient relationship - patient’s openness about their condition What do you suggest is the best approach to my study? Narrative or Phenomenological?"
posted on Jun 11, 2013, on the post Chapter 5: Five Different Qualitative Studies

"A very important chapter for my study. Before reading this post I did not have a clear idea about the differences between a research problem statement, purpose statement and research question. I will follow the steps provided in this chapter. It is great that I can also refer to the various terms provided while wording the introduction to my mini study. Using this chapter, I have to organize the following variables: - patient's trust -patient's confidence -patient's decision making capability - doctor-patient relationship - patient's openness about their condition Will have to revise this chapter and study the concepts thoroughly to derive meaning from the above factors."
posted on Jun 11, 2013, on the post Chapter 6: Introducing and Focusing the Study