All posts by e.berkovitz

About e.berkovitz

5081190220359848

Together not Better

“Chike’s School Days” is a very short story and from the first time reading it, I did not get what is going on and what is the point of the story, there was no conflict nor climax, it is just a story. However, when reading it for the second time the story slowly sunk in. it is about a person who refused to continue following the norms of the society he was brought up in. Amos decided to change the things that he thought was wrong with the class culture in Africa, he took on the ways of the white men, and even though Amos came from the upper class, he chose to marry an Osu women of lower class, knowing that he will be shunned and looked down for doing so, he still did it because he thought it was the right thing to do. I would say Amos didn’t like the idea of a lower class and an upper class, he wanted everyone to be regarded as equal.

Taking on the ways of the white man to Amos, meant becoming more westernized and more accepting to others, as we see Amos married a woman from the lowest class. One would think that Amos would teach his children to be accepting towards others too, however that didn’t turn out that way. When Amos’s child Chike at four years old was offered a piece of yam from a neighbor, Chike responded with “We don’t eat Heathen food” (828). How does this happen, one goes to great lengths to be more accepting and even marries a woman of lower class, yet his child still found a way to exclude rather than include others? It is because accepting the ways of the white man meant accepting the religion of the white man too, and the conflict happened where the westerners only accepted  one god, and in Africa they worshipped many gods. Most of the time a cultural divide doesn’t happen straight forward, this division sneaks in even with people who really mean well, it is some sort of human nature to want to feel better than others by looking down on them, and it is something that we need to be vigilant about all the time. When you see a reason to exclude, take a moment, a step back and find a way to include.

A Modest Proposal

In the last few years there is a growing concern on the divide between the rich and the poor, the lack of understanding and compassion they show and even when they do show some compassion they can’t really relate to the poor because they are not in the same circumstances as the poor. In the essay “ A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift, he proposes a solution to the problem that there are too many incompetent poor mothers and child beggars, how much they cost for the Irish kingdom and how they can lower the number of the poor or make them useful to the kingdom.

In his argument Swift uses some advantages that he thinks this proposal will add and solve. “it will prevent those voluntary abortions, and that horrid practice of women murdering their bastard children” (315). While reading this, I thought that the author would suggest some new phenomenon on how to keep the kids alive and render them useful; instead he proposes just the opposite. Using the element of surprise to capture the reader’s attention is great, however I got the feeling the author is pro life.

Swift proposes to kill two birds with one shot, lets make the babies of the poor a commodity, this will eliminate some beggars and help the poor earn some money. Either have mother’s sell their children on the market for the rich so the poor can earn some money, or since the baby has value it can be taken away from the mother as collateral for a debt they owe. However he isn’t suggesting to have them sold for labor, no, he wants the kids to be sold for food to the rich. As Swift writes in his essay, “I believe no gentlemen would repine to give ten shilling for the carcass of a good fat child… as I have said will make four dishes of excellent nutritive meat” (317) the author justifies cannibalism by quoting one of his friends that stated that in other places they sell the dead bodies of those who are killed for committing crimes.

The author is contradicting himself, in the beginning it bothers him that kids are being aborted, but in his proposal he suggest killing the kids for food. the biggest problem is that his proposal doesn’t affect him as he writes in the end of the essay that “ I have no children by which I can propose to get a single penny; the youngest being nine years old, and my wife past child bearing.” (320). To convince the reader that he has nothing to gain from this proposal. He also states that, ask any adult person, if they thinks that they would want to be sold for flesh when they were young, so they don’t have to suffer living poor. Even though the author thinks this is a modest proposal, this shows how far apart the mind of a well off person is from the poor.