The Gould Library at Carleton College has an outdoorsy-themed food and drink policy that mimics the “leave no trace” ethos of hikers and campers (“you pack it in, you pack it out.”) Should we rethink our policies? Clarify them?
-
Recent Posts
- Tech Sharecase, 8 December 2017
- Technology Sharecase, 10 November 2017
- Tech Sharecase, 20 October 2017
- Tech Sharecase, 8 September 2017
- Tech Sharecase, 5 May 2017
- Tech Sharecase, 21 April 2017
- Tech Sharecase, 18 November 2016
- Tech Sharecase, 23 September 2016
- Tech Sharecase: 28 July 2016
- Tech Sharecase on 10 May 2016
-
Archives
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- November 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
-
Meta
Dare I say this? A “leave no trace” concept is one that is practiced by outdoor enthusiasts (hikers/campers, etc.) and others that tend to have an outlook, appreciation and/or familiarity with limiting human impact on the environment. Perhaps this is an already familiar concept and an easier sell to Carleton College students. (Carleton College is a small college about an hour south of Minneapolis in Northfield, Minnesota with an enrollment of 1,986). Did you see the aerial photo of the campus? I’m not saying students in an urban setting would not appreciate it, but they may not be as familiar with “leave no trace” and “outdoor ethics”, beyond recycling and green buildings & appliances. Also, it would be harder to enforce with 15,500 students.
I’m concerned that students would interpret “leave no trace” to mean any kind of food can be enjoyed throughout the library, as long as they throw away garbage or do not leave food traces. Evidence (garbage) left during mid-terms and finals demonstrate that most students do not have a “leave no trace” mentality, currently. Also, it would be tricky to enforce. (Donuts are OK, but pizza isn’t because it is greasy and smelly.)
However, this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t rethink our policies, because the current policy doesn’t work. Perhaps a designated cafe area could be established, containing proper refuse & recycling containers and cleaning supplies. This way, garbage would not be throughout the library and students could have supplies to clean up after themselves or others. (Similar to a gym, where one wipes down a machine.) I’ll stop here, but could easily go on.
I like Linda’s point about outdoor enthusiasts and would like to believe it’s valid given my alma mater–aerial photo
But, I wonder if the constraints of physical space on this campus overall would make a “leave no trace” policy unmanageable, and what make our current policy a struggle. If we compared the capacity of the Gould Library, or even the Carleton College cafeteria(s) and our campus facilities, would the difference inform us in implementing a similar policy?
On the same page there is a link to the library’s printable levels of quiet signage. Level 1: Monastery Quiet; Level 2: Nature Film Narrator Quiet; Level 3: Discussion Group Quiet; Level 4: Blue Monday Quiet.