This post is in response to Kelly’s Post which can be found here: https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/rethinkeducation/?p=2640
I support Kelly’s claim that an education of practical use is interesting and even capable of leaving students better off than a traditional teaching. A traditional teaching involves subjects and courses that students may not find interesting and therefore little will be learned in these classes. In the novel “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” Harry’s class on Defense against the dark arts shows us that students much rather prefer to have a lesson that they know they could use in a life-or-death situation. The novel writes :
“A few curious looks were exchanged as the class put away their books. They never had a practical Defense Against The Dark Arts before… puzzled but interest the students got to its feet and followed Professor Lupin out of the classroom” (130).
As this quote suggests, the students suddenly knew this was not going to be an ordinary class. “Interested” they followed along Professor Lupin to see what alternative education they would receive.
On page 186, the novel states: They had a very enjoyable lesson, Professor Lupin had brought along a glass box containing a hinkypunk, a little one legged creature who looked as though he were made of wisps of smoke, rather frail and harmless looking.” As Kelly pointed, traditional teaching methods involve “lectures and reading chapters from book.” This method makes the class dull and may cause students to fall asleep. Here we see Professor Lupin once again going the extra mile to create a more interesting course that will have a greater impact on a student than a a traditional teaching method.