Post B

Sojourner Truth, a key figure in the woman’s rights debate during the 1850s helped unite women and argue for their equality to men. Her speech at the woman’s right convention in Akron Ohio as Robinson interprets was very important in its emphasis and variety of ways of showing how women are the same as men. From arguing she has “as much muscle to any man” to using a reference to the bible it was able to spread and connect with all kinds of different people.

Today one of the key arguments in the election is regarding immigrants and their rights. What gives an illegal immigrant rights in this country? And what rights are they entitled to? In America it seems very easy to overthink that we took land forcefully, whether from the Native Americans or even the Mexicans who owned territories that are now a part of the Southern states in America. Trump argues all illegal Mexicans should be deported and a wall should be built to keep them out. He even hints at the idea of not allowing any Muslims into the country.

This ignorant, somewhat white supremacist mentality is very similar to the one Sojourner Truth faced in the mid to late 19th century. To isolate a group of people for their race/heritage or religion is no better than the years when women and African Americans were oppressed by the government and the majority of Americans. Trumps seemingly idiotic and radical thoughts have swept America and he now somehow has a serious chance at winning this election, this countries past experiences such as that with Sojourner Truth and woman’s rights should be an example of what should not be repeated.

 

Border Security and Immigration in the 2016 Debate

Group B post

Why does a woman not deserve equal rights as men? Robinson Version talks about the different things that men and women are similar in. Women worked in the fields as much as men did, they were as strong as men were. She questions whether it’s the religious belief that has left men with this image about girls not being capable of doing what should and should not be done. but doesn’t a women deserve a second chance? Gage Version talks about how ideally a woman is supposed to be treated in the society but in reality she is treated the complete opposite. She points out that even in bible the woman plays an important role.

More than a hundred years later and we still face gender inequality. In the past, women physically did the same job as men. As Robinson Version explained, “I can carry as much as any man, and can eat as much too, if I get it.” Even when women are working in the same field and are performing the job as good as a man, why is it so difficult to see that we stand equal. If women are capable of completing the same task as men, why are we not given the same rights? Is it the picture that society has painted about women, that makes them look down upon us?

In the article ‘Women’s rights and opportunities,’ it says, “Women earn less than men across our economy – and women of color often lose out the most.” We seem to still be stuck in the same notion about gender equality. That women deserve less and they are weaker than men. In a country that boast about its freedom and unity and its protected rights, we fail to give women the rights they deserve.

Why do you think so many other countries have surpassed us and we still struggle with this topic?

Women’s rights and opportunity

Group B post

“ADDRESS AT THE WOMEN’S RIGHT’S CONVENTION IN AKRON, OHIO” (29,MAY 1851) was a speech given by Sojourner Truth, a women’s right activist. This speech compares the strengths of men and women and questions why men have more rights than women. Truth states that “I am as strong as any man that is now”. She gives us an insight into all the things that men do that she; as a woman  can also do.  She also explains what she can do that men cannot. Women are viewed as inferior to men and problematic. Truth talks about how “Eve caused man to sin”. She believes that women should be given the chance to make things right in the world. She also talks about the roles that women have in this world. Women are viewed as inferior yet are able to do more significant things that men can never do.

“The hidden sexism that could sway the Election” by Daniel Bush, is a text that describes sexism in the 2016 election. Sexism has been a crucial topic for this election because for the first time, a woman is chosen as a front runner. Hillary Clinton is said to be unqualified and untrustworthy. Her gender is used as a reason as to why she should not ,become President.  She is believed to be using her gender as a way to get votes.  Based on Truth’s example of Eve,  Hillary is described in this same perspective.  She is seen as manipulative just like Eve who manipulated man to sin.

The rights of women are still limited in this modern day and age. From the 1800s until today, many changes have been made to the constitution and yet women are still viewed as inferior. Truth spoke about the problems seen in our society that needs change but till now, little change has been made because of the mindset that most people have about this issue. Why are women seen as weak? What will it take for men and women to be seen as equal? I am very curious to know where the roots of sexism came from and if it can ever be reversed.

Contemporary text: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/features/hidden-sexism/

 

Group B Post

SOJOURNER TRUTH “ADDRESS AT THE WOMAN’S RIGHTS CONVENTION IN AKRON, OHIO” (29 MAY 1851) was one of the best know speech given by a women’s rights activist, Sojourner Truth. In this text, Truth sarcastically compares her ability against man that she can do anything that man can do and sometime she can do even more than man can do. Truth is declaring her ability is as equivalent as any man by repeating “as any man”, and claiming women do not receive as much rights “as any men”. Truth is accusing men for not giving women rights as man while it cost no risk to any man, and by not being able to do so, Truth insists that men are poor and useless with sampling the story from the bible when Jesus helped Lazarus. Truth concludes with that men were even nothing to do with Jesus’s birth and women gave Jesus a birth. Therefore, Truth finds men are in bad place and soon will the situation will be fixed I her last sentence “But man is in a tight place, the poor slave is on him, woman is coming on him, and he is surely between hawk and buzzard.”

In the recent presidential election, candidate Donald Trump accused candidate Hillary Clinton that reason she is in the position where she is because she is taking an advantage of being a woman, and if Clinton were not a woman, she would not have as many votes as she deserves today. Trump is accusing that Clinton uses her gender as a card to put her in the better place, and Clinton replies that it is right to use that card to fight for women’s right.

These two texts left me think that what is the difference between being fair and equal to each other when men and women are obviously not equal physically to begin with? Is it ultimately better to be equal in every aspect? It is the clear fact in the history, women had not been treated as equal “as any man”, and like Truth were fighting to deliver equal rights for women, the fight still continues today.

Source: “Women’s rights and Opportunity”

Women’s rights and opportunity

Group B Post

“What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July” was a speech given by Frederick Douglas on July 5. Douglas tries to focus on how these American values of freedom and liberty can’t be celebrated on the 4th of July by African Americans in the same way they can be celebrated by white Americans. Douglas knows he is giving this speech to primarily white listeners, and thus uses repetition and rhetorical questions to help them understand why it is he can’t celebrate this ‘national’ holiday in the same way that they can. Douglas repeatedly uses ‘you’ and ‘your’, especially the phrase ‘your fathers’ in order to create a sense of distance between him and the audience. The repetition instills the image in the listeners heads that they don’t share the same background as him, and more importantly that their ‘fathers’ didn’t create the country with his best interest in mind. Douglas also uses rhetorical questions to get the listeners thinking about this holiday that they celebrate as he says, “What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence?” and “Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in the Declaration of Independence, extended to us?”. This brings listeners back to his main focus, being that Douglas doesn’t feel he can participate in these patriotic celebrations because freedoms and values that have been celebrated have been denied to African-Americans.

In October of 2015, Bernie Sanders gave a speech in support of immigration and a path to citizenship for undocumented people in the country that were being mistreated and exploited. Whereas Douglas uses repetition to create a sense of distance between the two groups, Sanders uses repetition to create a feeling of unity. Sanders says, “Their story, my story, our story, is a story of America.” and his following sentences begin with ‘It is a story…”. By using repetition of the word story, Sanders creates a feeling unification and wants listeners to understand that these immigrants are the same as us. Sanders tries to appeal to the listener’s pathos and cause listeners to feel sympathy for them as he details their exploitation and struggles, just as the listener’s ancestors likely had. Sanders also uses rhetorical questions to make the listeners think about and feel sympathy for these immigrants as he says, “But how many more Immokalees are out there? How many fields or factories are there where people are used up and thrown away?”.

Although used for different purposes (distance vs. unity), both Bernie Sanders and Frederick Douglas use repetition and rhetorical questions to further their arguments and create a distinct image in listener’s heads.

  • Which use of repetition do you think is more effective? One that creates a more negative image (distance) or one that creates a more positive image (unity).
  • Does creating sympathy for the groups being mistreated help or detract from the speaker’s focus?

 

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-to-the-slave-is-the-fourth-of-july/

http://www.latintimes.com/bernie-sanders-immigration-read-full-speech-presidential-candidates-address-naleo-324484

 

Group A-Declaration of Independence

The Declaration of Independence was written to declare America’s independence from Great Britain. During those times the course of action taken to go public with grievances and issues was by writing documents on paper. John Hancock penned out a list of grievances in the Declaration which were aimed to discredit the King of England and his oppression on America. “He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.” This is one example from the text where the people state they are upset with the immigration reforms or lack thereof set by England.

A couple of weeks ago a respected news outlet The Washington Post posted a story with the headlines saying, “Donald Trump launches sexist, McCarthyite Twitter attack on ‘Morning Joe’ hosts.” “Morning Joe” is a morning talk show aired on MSNBC that touches on political topics that they deem important for their viewers. Naturally the topics this year have been focussed on Presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton. It is revealed in a video from that article that host Joe Scarborough denounces his support for Trump when Trump began to talk about banning Muslim people from entering America. Scarborough states, “I’m never going to vote for a guy that is saying he’s going to ban somebody just because of the god they worship” Trump responded by tweeting a serious of tweets including this: “Some day, when things calm down, I’ll tell the real story of @JoeNBC and his very insecure long-time girlfriend, @morningmika. Two clowns!”  This is just one example of Trump’s brash commentary towards his peers and critics.

Scarborough aired his issues with Trump’s immigration policy which is similar to what the writer’s of the Declaration did.  The major difference from these two readings are the vast differences in the methods of communicating. The Declaration of Independence was written with immense thought and consideration whereas in today’s society people can fire off tweets like the one Donald Trump sent to Joe and Mika.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2016/08/22/donald-trump-launches-sexist-mccarthyite-twitter-attack-on-morning-joe-hosts/?utm_term=.13fe4821090c

Contradictions With Our Founding Documents

I always find the topic of factions in the Federalist Paper no. 10 very interesting. Written only 11 years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, it shows a distinct fear of an uprising against the newly formed government. This fear was so great that the time was taken to write an entire paper on how to quash any kind of faction despite size or type

When the Declaration of Independence was written, our country was, itself, a faction of people escaping the tyranny of England. We listed our grievances against the King and created our own, new society. Yet we found ourselves, a short 11 years later, fearing that the same thing would happen within our new and great nation. We were still too young of a country to trust ourselves and our new government and values.

You would think that 240 years later, we would’ve fully found our voice as a nation, yet here we are, in this time of political mayhem, fearing factions (#BlackLivesMatter, for example) as if they aren’t the reason we became a country. Federalists were the people who truly supported the Constitution, yet doesn’t the muting of factions directly contradict the first amendment in the Bill of Rights? Perhaps there are a great many more contradictions to be found within our country and within our presidential candidates. Where do building a wall and evading the law come into an oath to “preserve, protect, and defend” our Constitution?

Then again, haven’t we always found ourselves, as a country, in contradiction with our founding documents: writing “We The People” to include only the white male elite?

 

 

Declaration of Independence

The Federalist Papers, No. 10.

U.S. Constitution. Art. II, Sec. 7.

Declaration of Independence & Constitution

Declaration of independence

The Declaration of independence is a famous text that was written to form our country. The tone was strict and firm, to enforce the way of life that our finders wanted. A big, “we the people theme”, can be that the men who wrote the papers were very hypocritical. As well, a good theme would be that the language used can be interpreted in many ways, so it can change with the time and culture, which it was many times. A great example would be slavery and discrimination. The first statement “all men are created equal” has created much controversy when African-american citizens were not being treated equally. Leaders such as Martin Luther King, used the Declaration of Independence to support his case.

The Constitution

The Constitution is another famous text that was written with the standard Bill of Rights and 17 that have been added. The Bill of Rights are straight forward and protect our freedom as American citizens. The tone used is very welcoming and encourages people to want to be in the United States. We were built on rebels, who wanted to have the freedom to believe and do what they mostly wanted, you can see that in the Bill of Rights. A theme for “we the people”, can be about how the amendments have helped people all around the world in the country. Another theme could be about the 17 added amendments that were formed to assimilate with time, such as the 19th which gave woman the right to vote. Today, the Constitution is used for things such as legalizing gay marriage, abortion, and gun laws. Many people believe that making abortion legal, will vandalize their first amendment. More importantly, people have been trying to get the second amendment changed, because of the amount of shootings in the past few years. However, it won’t be easy, since many people believe that their rights cannot be changed or taken away, for any reason.

Group A Post

  1. The Declaration of Independence represents a period where the United States was run by a unjust system and it was “the right of the people” to free themselves from Great Britain’s government. As an infringement against the people’s “unalienable rights” of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the United States drafted the document to establish a new system, with the best interest of its people in mind. The document argues that the US was under a corrupted system and owed it to its citizens to fight for a better government.
  1. Last year, republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivered a speech regarding his thoughts on “anchor babies”, or children born in America from noncitizen parents in order for the child to have legal citizenship. In the third minute of the video, Trump speaks his views on illegal Mexican immigrants and their abuse of “anchor babies” within the United States. Trump’s speech argues that the parent’s citizenship should determine whether or not a child born in the United States is allowed the rights a typical resident is given, such as social security, medicare and education. In the case of Mexican “anchor babies”, Trump does not believe birthright citizenship should be granted to the child.
  1. The Declaration of Independence and Donald Trumps speech share a common theme regarding an American’s basic human rights. In the Declaration of Independence, the US desired to separate itself from a tyrannical government and establish order in the country because it was owed to its people. In Donald Trumps speech, he seeks to strip the rights of an American even though their birth within the country grants legal citizenship. Trumps “anchor baby” views contradicts what the Declaration of Independence fought for their people to have.

 

Hancock, J. “Declaration of Independence” Avalon Project – Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776. Yale Law School, 2008. Web. 05 Sept. 2016.

Trump, D. “Donald Trump Mexicans Immigrants Speech – Wall Between US And Mexico.” YouTube. YouTube, 20 Sept. 2015. Web. 05 Sept. 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cp_JzeOGX1U

Final Project Group Assignments

Final Project Group Assignments:  These groups are key.  You should reach out to the members in your group immediately. I’ve tried to list Baruch email addresses here. If I don’t have one for you, or the email I’ve listed for you is incorrect, please post the correct address to the site and/or email me.  By next class, exchange contact information with your group members and share potential ideas for class project.]

Group 1 : Gender Equality

Akshay [[email protected]]

Anthony [[email protected]]

Abby [[email protected]]

Judith [[email protected]]

Group 2: Immigration

Danay [[email protected]]

Aidan [[email protected]]

CJ [[email protected]]

David [[email protected]]

Group 3: Political Correctness  (Neoliberal Views of Tolerance & Diversity)
Ilias [[email protected]]

Katrina [[email protected]]

Vanessa [[email protected]]

Taseer [[email protected]]

Group 4: Campaign Rhetoric

Moctar [[email protected]]

Jordan [[email protected]]

Kelsey [[email protected]]

Shin [[email protected]]

Group 5: Election Corruption

Daisy [[email protected]]

Samie [[email protected]]

Emir [[email protected]]

Kayla [[email protected]]

Group 6: Police Violence

Amson [[email protected]]

Sherpa [[email protected]]

Franklin [[email protected]]

Kwame [[email protected]]