Racism behind Invisibility

“I am an invisible man. No, I am not a spook like those who haunted Edgar Allan Poe; nor am I one of your Hollywood-movie ectoplasms. I am a man of substance, of flesh and bone, fiber and liquids — and I might even be said to possess a mind. I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me. Like the bodiless heads you see sometimes in circus sideshows, it is as though I have been surrounded by mirrors of hard, distorting glass. When they approach me they see only my surroundings, themselves, or figments of their imagination — indeed, everything and anything except me.”

In the “Invisible Man” by Ralph Ellison, we can already can see the central struggle of the novel. The narrator begins the prologue by introducing himself as invisible.”I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me,” not that it is one of his superpowers, nor is it due to accident, but because people in society ignore him because of the color of his skin. With this the narrator explains to the reader that this invisibility duos as an advantage yet a disadvantage. Yes, he doesn’t have to deal with other people’s problems and ordeals yet he aches to be seen and treated with respect his peers. The narrator write this prologue without ever saying his name. In doing so, the narrator is using his invisible as an advantage, to freely speak his mind without having to risk the consequences. His identity is even hid to the reader that he is confessing all of his feelings too.

The narrator realizes that the reason he is invisible to white people is because he is black, therefore, he describes them as blind. Stereotypes play a huge role in the setting of the novel. This is during postwar America in which whites viewed blacks in a certain light, as untrustworthy, muggers, etc. The narrator does not like how there are multiple identities given to him due to the color of his skin. Instead of his individuality, his qualities, his personality, people see him as something entirely different. This is seemingly difficult for the narrator as it doesn’t allow him to put his best foot forward in situations. This makes the narrator struggle with how others perceive him as well as how he perceives himself. This explains racism as a whole in itself, as those that are affected can relate to how stereotypes are used to describe them as a person.

Break Free From Traditions

Ralph Waldo Emerson delivered one of the most influential speeches, “The American Scholar” to Harvard’s Phi Beta Kappa Society. This society compromised of an honorary society of male students with stunning grade point averages. In this address, Emerson pushed to separate the way American writers, artists, and philosophers, create their own works separate from European traditions. Emerson conveys his message using various elements, one element that was very prominent was the usage of metaphors. Emerson paints a picture of how society, once whole, has become divided in several factions with a more refined purpose to live their life. I would say this was crucial in Emerson’s success in motivating his audience to create works that are original.”But unfortunately, this original unit, this fountain of power, has been so distributed to multitudes, has been so minutely subdivided and peddled out, that it is spilled into drops, and cannot be gathered. The state of society is one in which the members have suffered amputation from the trunk, and strut about so many walking monsters, — a good finger, a neck, a stomach, an elbow, but never a man,” (Paragraph 4). Emerson compares the society to a fountain of power which has divided into droplets of water that can not become united into one substance. In doing so, he makes in very clear of what his stance is on the ideology of jobs. He creates a metaphor to create a visualization of what it really means to be a separate entity from others. He also creates another visual image for readers, by comparing members in society as “monsters”. As though they are individual body parts, attempting to function as a whole, but never succeeding in doing so. At first I was confused when Emerson introduces the term, “Man Thinking”, in which is his way of saying those that deem themselves as writers must take their thoughts and turn them into a reality.