Break Free From Traditions

Ralph Waldo Emerson delivered one of the most influential speeches, “The American Scholar” to Harvard’s Phi Beta Kappa Society. This society compromised of an honorary society of male students with stunning grade point averages. In this address, Emerson pushed to separate the way American writers, artists, and philosophers, create their own works separate from European traditions. Emerson conveys his message using various elements, one element that was very prominent was the usage of metaphors. Emerson paints a picture of how society, once whole, has become divided in several factions with a more refined purpose to live their life. I would say this was crucial in Emerson’s success in motivating his audience to create works that are original.”But unfortunately, this original unit, this fountain of power, has been so distributed to multitudes, has been so minutely subdivided and peddled out, that it is spilled into drops, and cannot be gathered. The state of society is one in which the members have suffered amputation from the trunk, and strut about so many walking monsters, — a good finger, a neck, a stomach, an elbow, but never a man,” (Paragraph 4). Emerson compares the society to a fountain of power which has divided into droplets of water that can not become united into one substance. In doing so, he makes in very clear of what his stance is on the ideology of jobs. He creates a metaphor to create a visualization of what it really means to be a separate entity from others. He also creates another visual image for readers, by comparing members in society as “monsters”. As though they are individual body parts, attempting to function as a whole, but never succeeding in doing so. At first I was confused when Emerson introduces the term, “Man Thinking”, in which is his way of saying those that deem themselves as writers must take their thoughts and turn them into a reality.

One thought on “Break Free From Traditions

  1. I’m really happy you brought this up: “Emerson compares the society to a fountain of power…” because I think there’s much more to this story than just the idea of race. The narrator encounters powerful institutions and individuals throughout the story, all of which are persistent on maintaining their influence over such events. By literally breaking apart body parts, you diminish the body’s capacity to function as a whole. A finger can be a finger, but it is no longer attached to the hand that can lift things up, etc. The comparison of breaking apart a body to breaking down a society is quite powerful in its own dismantling, but the choice to convey a speech to an all-white, entitled male audience by “breaking them down” is the narrator taking control of the conversation and exhibiting HIS power. I hope that made sense!

Leave a Reply