Immanuel Kant defied “enlightenment is the human being’s emergence from his self-incurred minority”(Kant, p1), which he thinks that minority is the ability to understand something on their own, without anyone’s direction. However Kant stated that people become lazy, when they found someone who can guide them, teach them and do everything for them, people are comfortable to be a minor, therefor it is difficult for any single individual to enlighten themselves because they have never allowed to do so. Kant also believes freedom is importantly related with enlightenment, he stated ” For this enlightenment, however, nothing is required but freedom”(Kant,p5). Kant thinks the society limited the way of how people thinking, and doing things. He gave out examples of tax office, officer and the clergyman, they were all regulate people in the way of how they will like things to be done, “there are restrictions of freedom everywhere” Kant said. Therefore it is even more difficult for people to think freely and not to follow others direction .
In Frederick Douglass’s narrative of his slavery life, Kant’s idea of how enlightenment related with freedom can also be seen. Frederick was a slave, enlightenment at that time is way far for people to think, when they don’t even know their own birthday, can’t even write their own name. But Frederick learned how to read and write, his education encouraged him to escape from the slaver, pursue his own freedom.
Kant believes the freedom is the key of enlightenment , but for Frederick, without knowledge , without enlighten himself, he will never achieved his freedom.
What’s good.
You’re putting a theory text in conversation with the literary text.
Your understanding of the theory text seems very sharp.
You do point out (last sentence) an interesting relationship between them.
Concern:
Your reading of Douglass isn’t as strong as your reading of Kant. Also you would have done well to have focused on specific passages in Douglass.
I think your last sentence is good. It’s a thesis, but it’s not strongly worded as as thesis. Right now it’s presented as a casual observation after so many observations. If you were to use this statement as a thesis, I’d want you to go further. Make the claim that when we look at Kant’s text through the lens of Douglass what we see is a direct challenge to the idea that freedom is prior enlightenment (aka freedom is a condition for enlightenment), for Douglass procures his freedom only by way of his enlightenment.