I am a Muslim. This is a huge part of my life because this allows me to live my life a certain way in which I want to live it. Being a Muslim is a huge reason to why I’m … Continue reading
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
-
Meta
Posts: 9 (archived below)
Comments: 3
While scrolling through social media, I found this post and it caught my attention because of how funny and real it is. The “2nd grade” portion of this post displays the level of maturity and self control that both those presidential candidates had.
When writing this essay, my focus was mainly on highlighting the way John Boyega used rhetorical devices to succeed in delivering his message with his speech. The thing that drew me to this speech was the reasoning behind the speech. The black lives matter movement is something that inspires me to more for the black community. So, for this speech to be a huge inspiration to all black lives is the main factor as to why I wrote on this speech. A few things in writing this essay was easy for me. Some of those thing were explaining the reason to why the rhetorical devices a talked about were valid in speech, giving a summary of the speech at the beginning of my essay, and putting everything together in the hand. The hardest part for me while writing this essay was analyzing the video and trying to listen all at once to determine what those rhetorical devices were. My understanding of the speech elevated because while analyzing it I was focused on small things such as body language, tone changes and the setting of the speech. All those played into what made the speech as meaningful as it was. I would like the reader of this essay to keep in mind that this essay is something that is talks about something that weighs heavy on many people. The importance 0f this speech is something that travels throughout the entire world. I would give this essay the grade of a B+ because I did a good job of explaining why I chose the rhetorical devices that I’ve chosen. However, after reading it over I realized that I could’ve added more rhetorical devices that were used in Boyega’s speech.
This past president election has been something that I had been focused on for weeks. The suspense of this election has been so much more drastic than any other election in history because of the amount of controversy that follows it. Also following the very interesting presidential debates that has led up to that election. I wasn’t able to vote this year due to my age, but encouraged my family and friends to do so. I was proud to see the amount of people that voted. It shows that people are finally stepping up to make change. I was surprised to see some republican states turn in favor for Biden. One of the deciding factors in this election was the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although I don’t believe that trump is as bad as everyone paints him out to be, it’s good to see Biden in office because this is a chance to change the way this system is run even if that change is minuscule.
In the thesis of “Politics and the English Language”, George Orwell starts off by explaining the decline 0f language and how people who focus on this, can admit that the English language is in a bad place in this generation. He states that, “It is generally assumed that we cannot by conscious action do anything about it.” Meaning that the English language in this generation is spiraling downward and there is no stopping the spiral. But he then says later in the text that the matter isn’t untreatable. Orwell provides a few examples of writing that illustrates the bad way in which the English language is used and how it connects to the twisted way that political messages are delivered, as well as the writers that were responsible for those messages.
“In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible. Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face.” The significance in this quote is how Orwell refers to these world changing events and claiming that these acts are able to defended. What Orwell is implying is that the actions that he brought up can be defended by a political speeches and writing that will be hard to hear for most people. He later brings ups the need for euphemism in these messages. The use of Euphemism in these messages would be a way to soften the delivery of the speech or writing by substituting certain words.
One example of language that disturbs Orwell is “meaningless words”. That is also something that bothers me a lot. People that I talk to here and there feel the need to throw in certain words that they think is necessary instead of saying what comes of the top of their head. I view that use of language to be forcing and unrelated to everything that is being talked about. I may have included meaningless words in my writing a few times, but I never go out out my way to make sure I write those things. If I use meaningless words, it’s more of a in the moment type of deal. I believe that his critique is completely valid because it targets a real issue of people trying to sound articulate to get their points across, which usually has the opposite effect of the reason people use it.
The use of language and politics intersects with me today when it came to the Black Lives Matter Movement. There are many people that are opposed to this concept because they believe that saying “black lives matter” is going against all other races, when that simply isn’t the case. The problem that others see with this term is only including the words ” black lives”. Those opposed to this are simply taking the term out of context and aren’t realizing what it actually stands for.
From watching Joe Biden’s campaign, I believe the audience that is targeted in this video is America as a whole. In this video, we see Biden with several interactions with the American people, which is a way for him to advertise his image in a positive way. This video is intended for all that are voting in this upcoming election. The message that is being conveyed in this ad is Biden’s worth to the American people in a positive light. The ad highlights Biden’s plans and the things he brings to the table if he was to be chosen as president. This ad makes a connection, between the Coronavirus, racial identity, sexual identity, etc to show that no matter what we identify as, all those things “unites America”, as Biden stated in this ad. The main purpose of watching this video is to ultimately trust Biden and all that he stands for.
This ad has combination of positive and negative narratives. The beginning of the ad highlights the faults of Trump and the tone of the music gives off a sense of motivation to do better for the country, which is something Trump isn’t doing according to Biden. The second half of the video highlights the Biden’s positive attitude towards thhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3UsWMbUpF4is presidency and the music in this half of the ad portrays a glimpse of hope in the future of America, which allows the audience to feel a connection with Biden.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3UsWMbUpF4I believe that this ad has used a great technique well to develop it’s message. The use of Pathos in the ad constructs the video in a way that appeals to the target audience. Using the topics of the Coronavirus, racial identity, sexual identity, etc allowed that need of appeal to work successfully.
Prior to viewing this ad, my opinion on Biden and Trump is the same as it is now. So, I would say that this ad hasn’t really had an effect on me. However, this ad did ease my mind on the notion that Biden seems to have a plan for the well being of America’s future. My only problem with the ad was the lack of Logos used in the video. A number of statistics should’ve been used to corroborate the statements made in this ad.
One key takeaway from Richard Staub’s “Responding — Really Responding — to Other Students’ Writing”, is the different ways that teachers look for when reading a students comment to their classmates’ drafts. Some teachers look for comments placed in the margins right next to the drafts, while others look for letters or notes that address the draft as a whole. One thing I will try to keep in mind while responding to my classmates’ drafts is what will be the quality of my response to my classmates’ drafts.
Anne Lamott’s, “Shitty First Drafts” and George Dila’s “Rethinking the Shitty First Draft” are two texts that are used to inform readers about the different ways to go about writing first drafts. Lamott’s way of writing first drafts is more of a freestyle type of writing, while Dila’s first draft process is more of a think it through and edit while he’s writing type of style. After reading Anne Lamott’s essay, ” Shitty First Drafts”, I realized that her mindset when writing her first drafts is very similar to mine, from the standpoint of how she let’s her mind generate everything that is written on the paper and lets her ideas come as she writes. My process of writing first drafts usually requires no intensive thinking. As I’ve continued to write throughout the years, my mindset of first drafts have transitioned to the notion of first drafts aren’t meant to be perfect. It is meant to have mistakes in the writing. That is ultimately why it is called a first draft, because it will not be the last. I’ve always found it difficult to do planning and gather ideas before starting to write a first draft. Worrying about whether what you’re writing in the first draft is perfect or not, is what tends to limit your ability to get as much as you can on paper while writing. My style allows me to get things down and revise later, which has proved to be effective in my writing and that’s something I’ll continue to do in my writing.
The text I decided to write about is Trevor Noah’s “Born A Crime”. In this autobiography Trevor explained his own upbringing in South Africa and the way he was treated different because of the color of his skin despite being born there. He was viewed as an outcast in his own family because he was grew up in a community full of black people whilst being the only light skinned person in his community. The central ideas that are brought up in the text is fitting in and proving that you belong where you are. Trevor spoke the language of his native tribe, but that still wasn’t enough for the people in his community. All they paid attention to was the color of his skin. This issue that Trevor endured resonates with everything black people have to prove today. In most cases blacks can’t live the life they want to live because we are looked upon differently than everyone else. The same way Trevor had to prove his worth to other people is the same fight we are fighting to this day. “I soon learned that the quickest way to bridge the race gap was through language…I became a chameleon. My color didn’t change, but I could change your perception of my color.” Those lines in the text brought about the driving factor to what changed the way Trevor was perceived in his community. He may not have looked like the rest, but he certainly spoke like the rest. The ability of speaking any language that is spoken to you can bring about a way of connecting with others. I chose this text because of the way it resonates with issues that are being faced in America today. Social injustice starts off with others not knowing your worth and thinking you don’t belong and that is the connection this text. Trevor raised many points in his writing that can be used for kids today because others still face the problem of not fitting in within their community. It’s time to start looking at others internally and stop judging based off external factors.
I am a Muslim. This is a huge part of my life because this allows me to live my life a certain way in which I want to live it. Being a Muslim is a huge reason to why I’m … Continue reading