All posts by r.lin1

5081190220191621

To Sir, with Love and, Harry Potter: The Prisoner of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling presents two very different types of education.  The former is a traditional one, and the latter is imaginary.

The education in the movie consists of life lessons and corporal punishment. On the other hand, Harry Potter studies magic as a wizard. Nevertheless, students from education can get the same thing out of it. For example, the students in To Sir, with Love don’t get along with Thakeray at first, but at the end they realize that he truly cares about them and want the best for them. Similarly, Harry Potter hates Sirius Black for killing and betraying his parents. Later he finds out that he is innocent, he respects him. Through this he learns to forgive.

Furthermore, students receive help from an advisor that their students behaviors in both education.  In the movie, Thackeray breaks up the fight between a student and a gym teacher. He teaches the student how to be an adult. In Harry Potter, professor Lupin aids Harry along the way avoiding troubles and teaching him new skills.

Although the two education seems very different, they may bring similar outcomes. Through the lense of Harry Potter, I see a person can also grow mentally in unreal situations like a magic school.

Brave men

A Lesson Before Dying by Earnest Gaines reminds me of the film Return to Paradise directed by Joseph Rubio. The three main characters in the film Tony, Lewis and Sheriff became close friends during a trip to Malaysian paradise. Sheriff throws a rebel bike down a cliff and leaves a brick of hash in the garbage can in Malaysia. Tony and Sheriff return to New York but Lewis serves the last two years in prison for the destruction of the bike and obsession of drugs, which is enough to be prosecuted. Although Tony and Sheriff decide to take their share of responsibilities to save Lewis’ life, the judge still gives Lewis a death sentence. Lewis suffers from psychological damage during his imprisonment. Right before his execution, Sheriff calls out from the window to assure him that he is not alone. Jefferson writes in his last words in his diary “good by mr wigin tell them im strong tell them im a man” (Zobel 234). This shows that he understands he’s learned his lesson to express affections as a man, and will die as a brave and strong man. Victims in both works face an unchangeable decision, but at the last moment, they both confront it peacefully.

Thesis exercise #2

A good education should be relevant and meaningful. Emile: or A Treatise on Education Selections by Rousseau shows great contrast Jose’s education in Black Shack Alley by Joseph Zobel. I plan to look at the outcome of both education method and illustrate the importance of a meaningful education.

Introduction exercice #2

Jean Jacques Rousseau write that “man will never learn what befits a man except under its own conditions”. What is education if we can’t make use out of it? Although education is unique for everyone, it is undoubtedly that practical use is the ultimate goal. In order to illustrate this claim, this essay will look first at how Emile learns through a relevant education in Emile: or A Treatise on Education Selections by Jean Jacques Rousseau. Then, it will discuss the schooling method Jose experiences in Black Shack Alley by Joseph Zobel. Making this connection helps to clearly see the different effects the two education results in, thus understand the importance of proper setting for the education of a child.

To Sir with Love and Malcolm X

In the film To Sir, with Love, I respect Mr. Thackeray for that he consistently makes himself as an example for his students. He is always self-composed and very careful with his anger management; he never acts too extreme even though he is furious. If he scolds and curses at the students often, the students would talk back even louder, then the classroom would eventually become a clamorous street market. Speaking from my own experience, what a teacher does can really unconsciously influence the behaviors of the students. The importance of following an example is also shown in Reading selection:  “Learning to Read” excerpt from The Autobiography of Malcolm X. Malcolm X writes “when Bimbi first made me feel envy of his stock of knowledge. Bimbi had always taken charge of any conversations he was in, and I had tried to emulate him” (par.4). Bimbi motivates Malcolm X to improve himself.

Mr. Thackeray changes his way of teaching when he realizes the traditional textbook lessons don’t work. In the case of Malcolm X, he adapts the prison environment and utilizes what he has access to. He borrows “some tablets and pencils from the Norfolk Prison Colony school” (par.5) and he “copied into my tablet everything printed on that first page, down to the punctuation marks” (par.7). This shows that during times of conundrums, working with what you’ve got is the best thing to do. You might accomplish something like both cases have shown. Mr. Thackeray gains the respect he deserves from his students; Malcolm X learns how to read.

Black Shack Alley

Jose’s description of his experience with school and education contradicts Rousseau’s ideas on education.

In Emile, Rousseau believes that a child should be educated in a way that cultivates natural tendencies. He suggests “man is truly free who desires what he is able to perform, and does what he desires.” (5). In Black Shack Alley, Zobel describes “It was painful to me to spend days on end without reading aloud and in unison with other children” (76). Jose enjoys being in school “ran about like young animals enjoying freedom” (71). However, he is deprived of his freedom.

Not only can’t Jose do what he wants to do, but he also has to do what he doesn’t want to do. Jose feels that “spend each day in Mme Leonce’s dark kitchen and yard was for me a horrible experience” (69). By the time he finishes the chores, “Raphael had already left and though I ran quickly, I still reached school late” (69). He has become accustomed to the “dish-washing chore as the logical task to follow the meal; whereas polishing shoes after lunch upset my digestion, made me drunk. And it made me reach school late every afternoon” (70). He can’t avoid “being scolded by the mistress for late-coming” (70). Another time, Jose “reached school later than usual because, after the dishwashing and shoe-polishing chore, I had to sweep the yard” (71). Everything Mme Leonce does prevents Jose from getting a good education. Furthermore, M’man Tine doesn’t listen to his complaints and even asks him to “remain outside on my knees until dinner time” (71). All these lead him to doubt “perhaps I don’t even have the right to arrive at school so early” (71).

Rousseau also proposes that education truly matters when it is relevant. When Emile receives letters, “The note is read to him at last, but it is too late” (12). Later, “He does his best, and at last he makes out half the note” (12). Emile wants to learn how to read deliberately because it is going to help him meet a need. In Black Shack Alley, Godmother Fanny tirelessly drags the whole class to along. In fact, “we had forgotten everything we’d repeated” (93). Students don’t learn effectively because they are beaten into submission instead of developing their individual natures. The mistreatment Jose experiences in school and the negligence of his mental health by his grandmother clearly violates learning of nature.

Descartes and Franklin

This is a response to Barry’s post “Descartes ≠ Franklin”.

I understand the difference between Descartes and Franklin as you explained. Another way that they differs from each other is that Descartes only wants to discuss his method; he is not telling us to imitate him. In Discourse on the Method, Descartes describes “although my own satisfaction with my work has led me to present here a draft of it, I do not by any means therefore recommend to every one else to make a similar attempt” (pt.2, par.3). According to Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, Franklin urges people to follow his method. He says “I hope, therefore, that some of my descendants may follow the example and reap the benefit” (ch. 9, par. 17). He believes that his method can be “fully persuaded of the utility and excellency” (ch.9, par.18) and that “each person to be initiated should not only declare his assent to such creed, but should have exercised himself with the thirteen weeks’ examination and practice of the virtues, as in the beforemention’d model” (ch.9, par. 44).

I also notice that they have similar ideas. Franklin thinks “I judg’d it would be well not to distract my attention by attempting the whole at once, but to fix it on one of them at a time” (ch.9, par.4). This is similar to the third law Descartes formulates. Descartes says “The third, to conduct my thought in such order that, by commencing with objects the simplest and easiest to know, I might ascend by little and little, and, as it were, step by step, to the knowledge of the more complex” (pt.2, par.9). They both believe that a subject should be approached slowly starting with simple analysis towards more complex propositions.
Descartes says “imitating in this the example of travellers who, when they have lost their way in a forest, ought not to wander from side to side … they will come at least in the end to some place that will probably be preferable to the middle of a forest” (pt 3, par.3). He suggests that wrong decision is better than indecision. A person will not regret if he had tried. In the case of Franklin, he feels good about himself by attempting to perfect all thirteen virtues even though he fails.

Furthermore, Descartes says “of those who, possessed of sufficient sense or modesty to determine that there are others who excel them in the power of discriminating between truth and error, and by whom they may be instructed, ought rather to content themselves with the opinions of such than trust for more correct to their own reason” (pt.2, par. 4). They have the same opinion about modesty.

Freedom

In “What is Enlightenment?” by Immanuel Kant and The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass, a concurring importance of freedom in one’s development being expressed heavily.

In answering the question “What is Enlightenment?”, Kant addresses “For this enlightenment, however, nothing is required but freedom, and indeed the least harmful of anything that could even be called freedom: namely, freedom to make public use of one’s reason in all matters” (par.5). He thinks reason is essential to reach enlightenment. According to Kant, an individual should be able to practice his reason freely to the public. He gives the example of “as a scholar, who by his writings speaks to the public in the strict sense, that is, the world”. For the society to reach enlightenment, our government should allow reason in the public sphere. I see this as freedom of speech like what we have today.

During Frederick Douglass’s life as a slave, freedom of speech is far from approachable. Slavery prevents people from improving themselves through education. I relate this to Karl Marx’s theory of species-being, the process of transforming inorganic matter to create things is the core identity of the human being. He works towards making himself free by expanding his horizons though self-education. He says “When I was sent of errands, I always took my book with me, and by going one part of my errand quickly, I found time to get a lesson before my return”(ch.7, par.4); “my copy-book was the board fence, brick wall, and pavement”; (ch.7, par.8)“I used to spend the time in writing in the spaces left in Master Thomas’s copy-book, copying what he had written”(ch.7, par.8). His education gives him the strength of will to escape. He says that learning how to read “had given me a view of my wretched condition, without the remedy. It opened my eyes to the horrible pit, but to no ladder upon which to get out.” The monster in Frankenstein has a similar encounter. After he learns letters, he feel even more miserable about his situation.

Thesis statement

Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus concedes Rousseau’s idea that humans naturally have the potential to be good if society does not apply corrupting influence on them. The monster in Frankenstein demonstrates the importance of education by man and by things as stated in Emile.

Peer response

This is a response to Mohammed Uddin’s post, Emerson’s Views.

Emerson spends two paragraphs talking about the influence of nature on teaching a scholar.

I can see how Emerson’s evaluation on nature mirror Rousseau’s. Rousseau believes that a child should follow the natural pattern of learning. Emerson considers nature one of the most influential forms of teaching.

In addition, I also find the connection between Emerson and Locke like you mentioned. Emerson says “Every day, men and women, conversing, beholding and beholden. The scholar is he of all men whom this spectacle most engages” (par. 8). The role nature plays here is the same as Locke’s concept that all ideas come from sensation and reflection.

Emerson continues, “But what is classification but the perceiving that these objects are not chaotic, and are not foreign, but have a law which is also a law of the human mind?” (par.8). He views that human mind is the opposite of chaotic, infinite and foreign. Instead, we analyze facts and classify them into categories to see similarities and differences. I find this resonates with Descartes’ theory of deductive reasoning. Descartes believes that “by commencing with objects the simplest and easiest to know, I might ascend by little and little, and, as it were, step by step, to the knowledge of the more complex;” (pt.2, par.9). He suggests that knowledge is built on a simple and sturdy foundation.