Cost of Knowledge, the Elsevier Boycott

This week’s On the Media reported on the Elsevier Boycott that was initiated in December by Cambridge University mathethematics professor Timothy Gowers. The boycott seeks commitments from academics to refrain from participating in publishing, refereeing and editorial work for Elsevier publications.  New Scientist has dubbed this movement, now with 7,000 petition signees,  the “Academic Spring.

The Boycott singles out Elsevier’s business practices as being counterproductive to the spirit and goals of academic publishing–disseminating academic research and knowledge. The boycott’s Statement of Purpose  portrays Elsevier as, “a publisher motivated purely by profi t, with no genuine interest in or commitment to mathematical knowledge and the community of academic mathematicians that generates it.” As it goes on to explain, there are many publishers that could have been targeted, but Elsevier was chosen as a eggregious example of a publishing company that acts in opposition to the  exchange of information in academia.

Below are the three objections to Elsevier’s business practices spelled out at the petititon website thecostofknowledge.com:

  1. They charge exorbitantly high prices for subscriptions to individual journals.
  2. In the light of these high prices, the only realistic option for many libraries is to agree to buy very large “bundles”, which will include many journals that those libraries do not actually want. Elsevier thus makes huge profits by exploiting the fact that some of their journals are essential.
  3. They support measures such as SOPA, PIPA and the Research Works Act, that aim to restrict the free exchange of information.

For their part, Elsevier has issued their own statement claiming the boycott is based on erroneous information and dispute the assertion that the price increases are unjustified. I’ve gleaned the following points from their press releases and whilst listening to interviews with company spokespersons:

  • Per article cost of scholarly publication hasactually fallen in past years,
  • Rising costs are associated with the company’s efforts in quality control and for tasks associated with:
    –      Finding and staffing full-time scientific editors
    –      Finding reviewers for articles
    –      Ensuring article integrity
  • Elsevier costs are also rising  because of the proliferation of research from China and India
  • The digitization process is also costly

The petition, signees and statement of pupose can be found at Cost of Knowledge.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Cost of Knowledge, the Elsevier Boycott

Tech Sharecase, 3 February 2012

Facebook
In light of the rumored Facbook IPO we began by discussing the information Facebook keeps about its users and their activities. We watched a video posted on Information Aesthetics  regarding an Austrian Law student named Max who issued a request to Facebook  for his personal data and received a CD containing a 1,222 page document detailing his online activities. EU privacy law compels companies to respond to such information requests from citizens within 40 days.


Apropos this conversation, this past weekend On the Media reported on this very case as well as other stories during this weekend’s episode: “The Facebook Show”.  The recent  publication of “Web of Deceit: Misinformation and Manipulation in the Age of Social Media” by Anne P. Mintz was also noted during the discussion.

This lead to a review of the recent addition of  U.S. Consumer/Lifestyle information to the ReferenceUSA database and the sources for the info contained in this dataset.

Qualtics
We also discussed various  forms librarians have built with Qualtrics and the challenges in creating them. Below is one such form for library book purchasing which can be shared with faculty and departments:

http://bit.ly/baruchlibrarypurchases

Other topics
Lastly, we discussed Clicker registration for Fall semester as well as scanning and printing policies and procedures.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Tech Sharecase, 3 February 2012

Clean, Modern Take on the Suggestion Box

I love the “Have an Idea?” feature linked to throughout the website for the library at Cal State San Marcos. Clicking the link (which features a lightbulb icon) takes you to this “Have an Idea” page where you can submit your idea and view and vote on the ideas of others.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Clean, Modern Take on the Suggestion Box

Signs to Convey Quiet and Noisy Zones

The libraries at the University of Houston and Carleton College have some interesting signage to help users recognize what level of noise is acceptable in different parts of the library:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Signs to Convey Quiet and Noisy Zones

Tech Sharecase, 20 January 2012

Attendees

Janey Chao, Arthur Downing, Stephen Francoeur, Jin Ma, Rita Ormsby, Linda Rath, Mike Waldman

ooVo

Arthur led a demo of ooVoo, which is web conferencing software that the college has a campus-wide subscription to. You can use it for web-based:

  • one-to-one phone calls
  • one-to-many phone calls (conference calls)
  • one-to-one video chats
  • one-to-many video conference calls

The software includes screen sharing, which lets you show live what is on your screen with anyone you are having a video chat or video conference call with.

Another great feature is that you can initiate a phone call or a video chat with people who don’t have even have an ooVoo account. Instead, you send them a special URL that invites them to call/chat with you via the web. Once that other person clicks that link, they are asked to type in their name, and then click a button that will notify you via ooVoo desktop software that someone’s trying to reach you.

This software might be useful for:

  • faculty office hours
  • distance/online education
  • meetings with other librarians in CUNY and beyond

To get the ooVoo software installed on your work computer, you’ll need to contact the BCTC Help Desk.

QR Codes

Linda mentioned her use of QR codes on her profile page in the LibGuides system. When scanned with a smartphone, the code will send Linda’s contact information into the user’s address book. She used the i-nigma service to create the original QR code. Stephen talked about his use of bit.ly to create a short URL for the library’s customized Google Scholar link:

http://bit.ly/baruchgooglescholar

In bit.ly, each short URL that you create gets its own tracking page in your bit.ly account that gives you stats on the use of that short URL and also gives you a QR code for the URL in case you wanted to share that as well.

Usability Testing on on the New Library Site

Stephen described the first round of usability testing that was recently completed on the new library site (10 students performing three, pre-defined tasks each). We watched a video from one of the tests to get a sense of what usability tests look like and to see how one student reacted to the new site. Changes will be made to the redesigned site based on this round of tests and will lead to a second round of testing.

We talked about a model of testing that web design expert Steve Krug recommends in his 2010 book, Rocket Surgery Made Easy: The Do-It-Yourself Guide to Finding and Fixing Usability Problems. Krug suggests doing monthly tests with just three test participants. Instead of having a single observer watching and taking notes of what transpires between the test participant and test moderator, he argues for setting up a conference room filled with interested parties (web developers, etc. for that site being tested) who watch the tests live, take their own notes, and then convene after the testing session to come up with a list of top things to fix. According to a recent blog post by Matthew Reidsma, a web services librarian at Grand Valley State University, he’s started doing testing in this very manner and recommends it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Tech Sharecase, 20 January 2012

Essential Reading on Dealing with the Move to Digital

The Education Advisory Board recently released an insightful and provocative slide deck from a presentation that looked at the issues academic libraries are dealing with as they work through the process of moving deeper into digital collections: Redefining the Academic Library: Managing the Migration to Digital Information Services.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Essential Reading on Dealing with the Move to Digital

Tech Sharecase, 21 October 2011

Attendees
Janey Chao, Stephen Francoeur, Rita Ormsby, Ryan Phillips, Mike Waldman

Digital Public Library of America
We took a look at the demo site for the ShelfLife-Library Cloud interface that the Harvard Library Innovation Lab put together for its proposal to the Digital Public Library of America. We also discussed what the mission of the Digital Public Library of America could be or should be (or could never be).

Going Public with Price Hike Info
We talked about this blog post by Barbara Fister that shed light on price hikes at her library for SAGE and ACS journals. This led to a larger discussion of big deal journal subscriptions and open access publishing in general.

Foreign Language Dictionaries and Language Instruction
We discussed a few options for foreign language dictionaries (notable Oxford Dictionaries Online) and language instruction (Mango, which we have a trial for, and Rosetta Stone).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Student Use of Technology During Finals

This week, a new report came out from Project Information Literacy that details the findings of a study about how students use technology while in the library to cram for finals. There’s a long report (that I haven’t read yet) and, for those of us visually minded, this pleasant and breezy video summary.

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/2-M5qL6HaG0" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Student Use of Technology During Finals

How Students Feel about Library Architecture and Design

An article in the September 2011 issue of College and Research Libraries details the findings of a fascinating study into the way students perceive library architecture (exteriors and interiors), specifically modern vs. traditional design. The most compelling conclusion was that students value highly having books around them in the library even if those books may go unused:

If asked, students may not state that they want visible stacks in the library; in fact, if asked whether they intend to use the books on the shelves, they may say they have no intention of using them. However, if the stacks are taken completely away, they may feel a keen detrimental effect. Therefore, it is important to examine the academic library from this affective perspective prior to planning new construction or making any drastic changes in the design and model of the traditional library, rather than relying on student input in the simplistic form of “Please let us know what you’d like to see in the new library.” While students may request a coffee shop, computer stations, and the latest technology, this cannot reflexively be considered to be a wish for those things to the exclusion of more traditional design and items. Traditional and modern elements can happily coexist, but careful planning and sensitivity to these subtle, but significant, desires are required. (p. 437)

In designing the survey instrument for the study, the authors wanted to discover to what extent students had feelings about libraries as spiritual, sanctified places. They discovered that students had even stronger feelings about the spirituality of libraries than was expected and that those feelings should be kept in mind during re-designs of older libraries and construction of new ones:

This empirical study affirmed our hypothesis that spaces deemed as “sacred” or “sanctified” produce affective benefits for people that extend beyond attitudes and into the realm of behavior (projected library use). Circulation statistics do not measure these benefits; students may not actually use the books on the shelves, but they “sanctify” the books—being around the books makes them feel more scholarly and connected to the institution’s educational mission. This type of response is borne out in the literature examining the affective responses to sacred spaces. Being in the presence of sanctified objects increases the worshipper’s spiritual experience even if the worshipper does not technically “use” the objects. Within this context, the overall contribution of “spiritual” library items to the greater sacred ambience should not be taken lightly. While students clearly value computers in libraries, paradoxically they do not like tech-heavy–looking spaces; students want new technologies presented in traditional academic surroundings.These findings have implications for new construction and remodels. (p. 436)

Jackson, Heather Lea, and Trudi Bellardo Hahn. “Serving Higher Education’s Highest Goals: Assessment of the Academic Library as Place.” College & Research Libraries 72.5 (2011): 428 -442. Web. 14 Oct. 2011.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on How Students Feel about Library Architecture and Design