To conduct this experiment I had help from two of my friends and asked them to try their best to remain impartial and focus on objectivity. My verbal summary helped me understand that so far I was on the right path when trying to satisfy the prompt of the paper. My arguments were well within reason and remained within the scope of the question. At times I stretched the question out but I was able to pull it back into the paper. Hitherto, my paper is stronger than the summary I had written during the experiment. The experiment did also help me realize flaws and discrepancies that I feel I would need to fix moving forwards. Personally, I feel like I have to make better connections to the points in the real world. I express the point of the art piece a lot. And I give it justification while doing so, however, the comparison and dichotomy between it and the real world are lacking and need attendance. Connecting the art piece to the real world will help readers understand the paper better. Especially if the reader is unfamiliar with the art piece I am using. So far that is all I have found that requires my attendance.